Introduction: This study aimed to investigate the short-term effects on the circummaxillary sutures induced by microimplant-assisted rapid palatal expansion (MARPE) in skeletally mature patients.
Methods: Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of preexpansion (T0) and postexpansion (T1) of 23 patients (mean age, 20.9 ± 3.65 years) treated with MARPE were evaluated. The T0 and T1 CBCT images were reoriented and superimposed on the basis of the anterior cranial base, using OnDemand3D software (Cybermed, Seoul, Korea). Then, width changes of 9 circummaxillary sutures (frontonasal, frontomaxillary, frontozygomatic, nasomaxillary, zygomaticomaxillary, intermaxillary, midpalatal, zygomaticotemporal, and pterygopalatine sutures) were measured on 1 section of each patient's T0 and T1 CBCT images. In addition, correlation coefficients between changes in the midpalatal sutures, the amount of appliance activation, age, and the changes in other circummaxillary sutural widths were also calculated.
Results: Statistically significant (P <0.05) width increases were found in all 9 circummaxillary sutures. The changes in midpalatal suture at the maxillary central incisor level positively correlated with the intermaxillary sutures at the anterior nasal spine level, midpalatal sutures at the posterior nasal spine level, and frontomaxillary sutures (P <0.05). In addition, the changes in the midpalatal sutures at the posterior nasal spine level also positively correlated with the changes in the intermaxillary sutures at the anterior nasal spine level, frontomaxillary sutures, and medial pterygopalatine sutures (P <0.05).
Conclusions: All 9 circummaxillary sutural widths increased in skeletally mature patients immediately after MARPE. The greatest increases in width were measured in the midpalatal sutures and the intermaxillary sutures, followed by the frontomaxillary sutures.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2021.01.023 | DOI Listing |
Korean J Orthod
November 2024
Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea.
Turk J Orthod
June 2024
Marmara University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics, İstanbul, Turkey.
Objective: This retrospective clinical study aimed to evaluate the maturation of intramaxillary and circummaxillary suture systems and cervical vertebral maturation as predictors of the skeletal response achieved by rapid maxillary expansion (RME).
Methods: A Digital Imaging and Communication in Medicine dataset of 20 patients (mean age: 15.55 years) prior (T0) and after (T1: 3.
Prog Orthod
March 2024
Department of Orthodontics, College of Dental Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, 173 Ashley Ave, MSC 507, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
Objective: To analyze and compare the effects of a traditional laboratory-fabricated Hyrax expander (T-Hyrax) and two different 3D-printed Hyrax expander models relative to tension points, force distribution, and areas of concentration in the craniofacial complex during maxillary expansion using finite element analysis.
Materials And Methods: Three maxillary expanders with similar designs, but various alloys were modeled: a T-Hyrax, a fully printed Hyrax (F-Hyrax), and a hybrid printed Hyrax (H-Hyrax). The stress distributions and magnitude of displacements were assessed with a 5 mm expansion in a symmetrical finite element model.
J Craniofac Surg
June 2024
Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey.
Objectives: This study used computed tomography (CT) to compare the bone thickness and density values around the zygomaticomaxillary, zygomaticotemporal, and pterygomaxillary sutures that are resistant to rapid maxillary expansion (RME) treatment according to age, sex, and cervical vertebrae maturation (CVM) stage.
Methods: The study included 200 paranasal sinus records obtained for medical diagnosis and examination in a radiology clinic. The records provided data on 110 males and 90 females aged between 4 and 28 years.
Cureus
December 2023
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Priyadarshini Dental College and Hospital, Tiruvallur, IND.
The correction of skeletal class III malocclusions is one of the most difficult orthodontic treatments. Skeletal Class III malocclusion may result from a combination of maxillary deficits and mandibular prognathism, mandibular prognathism alone, or maxillary deficits alone. Treatment options include an orthopedic appliance (facemask and chin cup), orthodontics with camouflage, a combination of orthognathic surgery and orthodontics, and the recently introduced bone-anchored maxillary protraction.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!