Background: Recent studies in children with idiopathic rectal prolapse report up to 48% require surgical intervention to manage refractory disease. We sought to examine outcomes of our non-surgical approach to managing rectal prolapse using a bowel management program.
Methods: A retrospective review was performed for all children with the diagnosis of rectal prolapse between 2011 and 2020. Children with a rectal polyp or hemorrhoid were excluded.
Results: 47 children with rectal prolapse were identified (median age at diagnosis of 4 years (IQR 3,7.75); age ≤ 4 years n = 30; age > 4 years n = 17). Associated diagnoses included constipation (n = 45, 96%) and psychiatric diagnoses (n = 7, 14%). Children underwent a bowel management program including stimulant laxatives in 44 (94%) and osmotic laxatives in 2 (4%). Median follow-up time was 181 days (IQR 77, 238). Median time to resolution of rectal prolapse was 9 months (IQR 4, 13) with a maximum time to resolution of 31 months. We compared children ≤ 4 years old (Group A) to those > 4 years old (Group B). Psychiatric diagnoses were less common in Group A (3.5 vs. 38.9%, p = 0.003). Median time to spontaneous resolution was 6.5 months (IQR 3.5, 9.5) in Group A versus 13.5 (IQR 4, 16) months in Group B, p = 0.13. No differences in surgical intervention were identified. Three (6.4%) patients required surgery for prolapse.
Conclusions: A bowel management program is an effective treatment for most children with rectal prolapse. This data suggests that surgical intervention is unnecessary in most children.
Level Of Evidence: III.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2021.11.003 | DOI Listing |
Cureus
December 2024
Pediatrics, A.T. Still University - School of Osteopathic Medicine in Arizona, Mesa, USA.
In the absence of preexisting conditions, rectal prolapse is rarely seen in children older than four years old. This case report presents a peculiar instance involving a previously healthy five-year-old female who presented to the clinic with her parents due to a three-day history of constipation, hard stools, and painful defecation. Physical examination revealed a rectal prolapse.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt Urogynecol J
January 2025
Department of Paediatrics, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth (Deemed-to-be-University), Pimpri, Pune, 411018, Maharashtra, India.
Objective: To describe our experience with anorectal malformation (ARM) patients, while analyzing complications and risk factors.
Materials And Methods: A retrospective study of ARM patients aged 0-18 years old undergoing surgery from 2006 to 2023 was carried out. Demographic variables, associated malformations, age and repair surgery operating times, presence and type of colostomy, previous intestinal preparation, and presence and type of surgical complications -intestinal occlusion, anal prolapse, stenosis, bleeding, dehiscence, extrusion, anoplasty misposition, urethral perforation, and stomal complications- were collected.
Urogynecology (Phila)
January 2025
From the Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA.
Importance: The Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) stages do not correlate with symptoms or characterize important prolapse subtypes.
Objectives: We hypothesize that clinically meaningful prolapse "phenotypes" utilizing POP-Q measurements can be defined. The primary aim was to define the phenotypes and their frequency.
Eur J Pediatr Surg
January 2025
Surgery, Colorectal and Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery, Children's National Hospital, District of Columbia, United States.
A novel modification of the cutback procedure, a posterior rectal advancement anoplasty (PRAA) for select male patients with an anorectal malformation and a rectoperineal fistula was recently described which incised only within the limits of the sphincteric ellipse and eliminated an anterior rectal dissection, thus avoiding any possibility of a urethral injury. This report provides longer term postoperative outcomes after PRAA. Method A retrospective, single institution study was performed examining male patients with a rectoperineal fistula between 1/2020-12/2023.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!