The ethics of returning nonactionable genetic research results to individuals are unclear. Apolipoprotein L1 () genetic variants are nonactionable, predominantly found in people of West African ancestry, and contribute to kidney disease disparities. To inform ethical research practice, we interviewed researchers, clinicians, and African American community members (  =  76) about the potential risks and benefits of returning research results. Stakeholders strongly supported returning results. Benefits include reciprocity for participants, community education and rebuilding trust in research, and expectation of future actionability. Risks include analytic validity, misunderstanding, psychological burdens, stigma and discrimination, and questionable resource tradeoffs. results should be offered to participants. Responsibly fulfilling this offer requires careful identification of best communication practices, broader education about the topic, and ongoing community engagement.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9053332PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15562646211063267DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

returning nonactionable
8
african american
8
stakeholder perspectives
4
returning
4
perspectives returning
4
nonactionable apolipoprotein
4
apolipoprotein apol1
4
apol1 genetic
4
genetic african
4
american participants
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!