AI Article Synopsis

  • This study aimed to determine which technique (standard, ultrasonography (USG), or near-infrared light (NIR)) was most effective for successfully placing a peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) on the first attempt in patients with difficult vascular access (DVA).
  • Results showed that the first attempt success rate was highest with USG at 78.9%, compared to 62.2% for standard methods and 58.9% for NIR methods.
  • Though USG had the highest success rate, it also took the longest to perform, suggesting a trade-off between time and immediate success when accessing veins in DVA patients.

Article Abstract

Objectives: Successful placement of a peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) on the first attempt is an important outcome for difficult vascular access (DVA) patients. This study compared standard technique, ultrasonography (USG), and near-infrared light (NIR) in terms of success in the first attempt in patients with DVA.

Methods: This was a prospective, randomized controlled study. The study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital. Emergency department patients who describe DVA history, have no visible or palpable veins, and were assessed by the nurse to have a difficult PIVC were included to study. The PIVC procedure was performed on patients by standard, USG, or NIR device techniques. For all approaches, the success of the first attempt was the primary aim. Total procedure time, the total number of attempts, and the need for rescue intervention were secondary aims.

Results: This study evaluated 270 patients. The first attempt success rates for USG, standard, and NIR methods were 78.9%, 62.2%, and 58.9%, respectively. The rate of first attempt success was higher in patients who underwent USG (USG versus standard, P = .014; USG versus NIR, P = .004; standard versus NIR, P = .648). The total median (IQR) procedure time for USG, standard, and NIR methods was 107 (69-228), 72 (47-134), and 82 (61-163) seconds, respectively. The total procedure time was longer in patients undergoing USG (standard versus USG, P <.001; NIR versus USG, P = .035; standard versus NIR, P = .055). The total median (IQR) number of attempts of USG, standard, and NIR methods were 1 (1-1), 1 (1-2), and 1 (1-2), respectively. A difference was found among the groups regarding the total number of attempts (USG versus NIR, P = .015; USG versus standard P = .108; standard versus NIR, P = .307). No difference was found among groups in terms of the need for rescue methods.

Conclusion: It was found that USG increases the success of the first attempt compared with the standard method and NIR in patients with DVA.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X21001217DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

procedure time
12
usg standard
12
usg
9
standard technique
8
technique ultrasonography
8
near-infrared light
8
vascular access
8
randomized controlled
8
success attempt
8
total procedure
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!