In human learning a distinction has been made between implicit and explicit learning. Implicit learning is thought involve automatic processes of the kind involved in Pavlovian conditioning, while explicit learning is thought to involve conscious hypothesis testing and rule formation, in which the ability to report the rule used to learn the task is taken as evidence. Because non-verbal animals cannot provide such evidence, several indirect methods have been proposed. One of these methods is faster learning by humans of certain explicitly learned tasks than implicitly learned tasks, but pigeons do not show a similar difference. Another method involves the 1-back-reinforcement conditional discrimination (if A choose X, if B choose Y) in which feedback following the conditional response is delayed until the next trial. It has been argued that implicit learning cannot occur over the delay between the conditional response and the reinforcer on the next trial, yet, it has been found that monkeys can learn this 1-back reinforcement task. We have argued that such learning can occur implicitly. We have found that pigeons, a species not thought to learn explicitly, can show significant learning of both 1-back reinforcement matching and 1-back reinforcement mismatching, two versions of the 1-back-reinforcement conditional discrimination. We propose that the evidence for explicit learning by non-verbal animals suffers from alternative simpler accounts because the rationale for explicit learning is based on assumptions that likely are not correct.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2021.104562DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

1-back reinforcement
16
explicit learning
16
learning
10
reinforcement matching
8
implicit explicit
8
implicit learning
8
learning thought
8
thought involve
8
non-verbal animals
8
learned tasks
8

Similar Publications

The escalating global burden of age-related neurodegenerative diseases and associated healthcare costs necessitates innovative interventions to stabilize or enhance cognitive functions. Deficits in working memory (WM) are linked to alterations in prefrontal theta-gamma cross-frequency coupling. Low-intensity transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) has emerged as a non-invasive, low-cost approach capable of modulating ongoing oscillations in targeted brain areas through entrainment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Humans can learn tasks explicitly, as they can often describe the rules they have used to learn the task. Animals, however, are thought to learn tasks implicitly (i.e.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

For humans, a distinction has been made between implicit and explicit learning. Implicit learning is thought to involve automatic processes of the kind involved in much Pavlovian conditioning, while explicit learning is thought to involve conscious hypothesis testing and rule formation, in which the subject's statement of the rule has been taken as evidence of explicit learning. Various methods have been used to determine if nonverbal animals are able to learn a task explicitly - among these is the 1-back reinforcement task in which feedback from performance on the current conditional discrimination trial is provided only after completion of the following trial.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

In human learning a distinction has been made between implicit and explicit learning. Implicit learning is thought involve automatic processes of the kind involved in Pavlovian conditioning, while explicit learning is thought to involve conscious hypothesis testing and rule formation, in which the ability to report the rule used to learn the task is taken as evidence. Because non-verbal animals cannot provide such evidence, several indirect methods have been proposed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study explores how changes in brain activity relate to improved cognitive and academic performance, focusing on healthy male volunteers.
  • Participants engaged in a task featuring rewards that indicated above-average performance, while their neural activity was monitored using magnetoencephalography.
  • Results showed that performance improved more significantly under the reward condition, with decreases in alpha brain wave power in specific areas linked to better task accuracy, shedding light on the neural mechanisms of cognitive enhancement.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!