Statement Of Problem: Before dental implants are restored, osseointegration is often verified by torque testing the implant. For this test, it might be appropriate to select the torque subsequently used to tighten the abutment screw during prosthetic delivery. However, whether the full torque applied to the abutment screw is transferred to the implant-bone interface remains unknown.

Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess whether the same torque is transferred to the implant-bone interface when tightening abutment screws and when torque testing implants and to investigate whether the implant system used affects the torque transfer.

Material And Methods: A digital torque gauge was used to register the torque directed to a simulated implant-bone interface. Twenty implants from 4 different manufacturers were successively secured to the digital torque gauge. An implant driver was used to torque test the implant. An implant abutment screw was then tightened to attach a universal base (TiBase) abutment to the implant. During both tests, a mechanical torque limiting device was used to apply the same manufacturer-specific torque. For both experiments, the peak torque transferred to the simulated implant-bone interface was recorded. To allow pooling data from different torque targets, the data were converted into absolute difference. A t test was used to evaluate whether the same magnitude of torque was transferred to the implant-bone interface when tightening abutment screws and when torque testing implants. An ANOVA was used to test whether the percentage of torque transferred to the implant-bone interface was impacted by the implant system used (α=.05).

Results: No significant difference was found between the torque transmitted when tightening an abutment screw and that transmitted when torque testing the implant (P=.600). Also, no difference was found in the percentage of torque transferred to the simulated implant-bone interface of different implant systems (P=.996).

Conclusions: Regardless of the implant system used, when tightening abutment screws and when torque testing implants, the same amount of torque is transferred to the implant-bone interface.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.10.023DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

implant-bone interface
36
torque transferred
28
transferred implant-bone
24
torque testing
24
torque
23
tightening abutment
20
abutment screws
16
screws torque
16
testing implants
16
abutment screw
16

Similar Publications

Context: Biomaterials such as platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) have shown to improve healing and osseointegration.

Aims: The aim of this study was to clinically and radiographically evaluate and compare immediate implants placed with and without PRF.

Settings And Design: This prospective and comparative study was conducted among 30 patients in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Govt.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Signs of in-vivo aging of zirconia from explanted dental implants with porous coating after several years in function.

Acta Biomater

January 2025

MATEIS, UMR CNRS 5510, INSA, FR- 7 Avenue Jean Capelle, 69621 Villeurbanne cedex, France. Electronic address:

The present study investigated the in vivo aging of yttria-stabilized zirconia (YSZ) oral implants (ZiUnite®) removed after 37 to 181 months. These implants featured a porous zirconia surface to enhance osseointegration. They were placed in prospective clinical investigations and had to be explanted due to peri‑implant bone breakdown.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Implant fixation is often the cornerstone of musculoskeletal surgical procedures performed to provide bony fixation and/or fusion. The aim of this study was to evaluate how different design features and manufacturing methods influence implant osseointegration and mechanical properties associated with fixation in a standardized model in cancellous bone of adult sheep.

Methods: We evaluated the performance of three titanium alloy implants: (A) iFuse-TORQ implant; (B) Fenestrated Sacroiliac Device; and (C) Standard Cancellous Bone Screw in the cancellous bone of the distal femur and proximal tibia in 8 sheep.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Tibial bone fractures in the malleolar regions are a major concern during the early postoperative period of total ankle replacement (TAR), affecting patient outcomes such as stability and recovery. Design, placement, and anatomic misalignment of implant components can contribute to malleolar fractures. The aim of this study is to understand the influence of implant design features, including keel, peg, stem, and bar type design, and bone-implant interfacial conditions on malleolar fracture following TAR.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Implant failure of the Compress prosthesis: a case report.

J Med Case Rep

January 2025

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya University Hospital, 65 Tsurumai, Showa, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8550, Japan.

Background: The Compress is designed to achieve bone formation and stability by applying pressure at the bone-implant interface, minimizing the likelihood of aseptic loosening, which is a complication of stem implants. Herein, we report two cases of implant failure using the Compress.

Case Presentation: Case 1 describes a 36 year-old Japanese man who underwent extraarticular tumor resection, Compress arthroplasty, and reconstruction with a gastrocnemius flap after preoperative chemotherapy for a secondary malignant giant cell tumor in the right distal femur.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!