Background: Due to language and cultural barriers, people with aphasia from culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) backgrounds are at risk of disadvantage in their access to comprehensive care. They are at higher risk of poorer inpatient outcomes in addition to challenges in receiving appropriate aphasia assessment and intervention.
Objectives: This study aims to examine the extent and nature of what is known about the inpatient phase of aphasia rehabilitation for CALD stroke survivors and identify potential research gaps in the literature for investigation.
Methods: A scoping review with systematic search was conducted in September 2020 following the PRISMA Scoping Review checklist. Five electronic databases were searched using a combination of terms pertaining to "aphasia," "inpatient care" and "CALD." Key variables were extracted from studies that met the inclusion criteria for analysis.
Results: Eighteen studies were yielded. Data regarding the inpatient phase of care indicate that CALD people with aphasia do not always receive comprehensive assessment or intervention in all their languages that may impact their discharge destination and access to community services. Speech-language pathologists (SLPs) report numerous barriers to service provision for this population. No studies investigated the degree and nature of differences in outcomes between CALD and non-CALD stroke survivors with aphasia.
Conclusions: CALD stroke survivors with aphasia inconsistently access SLP services in hospital. Assessment is unlikely to be conducted in patient primary languages and therapy is usually provided in the language of SLPs. Further research is required to determine whether this impacts functional outcomes and health services.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2021.2008599 | DOI Listing |
Alzheimers Dement
December 2024
Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Background: Alzheimer disease (AD) involves neurodegenerative disorders with progressive cognitive decline. Atypical presentations like Posterior Cortical Atrophy (PCA) and Logopenic Variant Primary Progressive Aphasia (lvPPA) exhibit distinct clinical profiles. PCA affects the posterior parietal and occipital lobes, causing visuospatial deficits, while lvPPA manifests as language impairment in the temporoparietal region.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAlzheimers Dement
December 2024
Department of Pathology, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Background: Individuals meeting neuropathological criteria for Alzheimer's disease (AD) may manifest with atypical clinical syndromes. Past work showed that the neurobiological basis for these differences is related to specific neuronal vulnerabilities for tau pathology. For instance, amnestic cases have a higher burden of neurofibrillary changes in CA1.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) remains one of the most common forms of early-onset dementia (45 to 65 years). FTD consists clinically and pathologically of a heterogeneous group of disorders characterized by progressive frontal and temporal lobe atrophy. Thirty to fifty percent of cases have a family history of the disease.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAlzheimers Dement
December 2024
Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Background: Affective cognition and emotion processing is impaired in amnestic Alzheimer's disease (AD), although less is known about atypical (AT) variants such as logopenic variant primary progressive aphasia (lvPPA) and posterior cortical atrophy (PCA). The affective blindsight pathway bypasses V1 via the superior colliculus-pulvinar route to activate the amygdala in cases of occipital lesioning and may explain maintenance of emotion identification and visual information processing in non-amnestic AD despite atrophy in visuospatial regions. We sought to characterize functional connectivity from key regions along the affective blindsight pathway in a clinically heterogeneous AD cohort.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAlzheimers Dement
December 2024
Dementia Research Centre, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Background: Primary Progressive Aphasia (PPA) is a neurodegenerative disorder primarily affecting language abilities, with clinical variants (nonfluent/agrammatic variant [nfvPPA], semantic variant [svPPA], logopenic variant [lvPPA], and mixed-PPA [mPPA]) categorized based on linguistic features. This study aims to compare PPA cohorts of native speakers of two different languages: English (an analytic language with deep orthography) and Italian (a synthetic language with shallow orthography).
Methods: We considered 166 English participants (70 nfvPPA, 45 svPPA, 42 lvPPA, 9 mPPA) and 106 Italian participants (14 nfvPPA, 20 svPPA, 42 lvPPA, 31 mPPA).
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!