Background And Aims: The Japan NBI Expert Team (JNET) classification is the first unified classification criteria for colorectal tumors using magnifying narrow-band imaging (NBI) in Japan. However, the diagnostic stratification ability of the JNET classification with dual-focus magnifying NBI (DF-JNET) has remained obscure. The aim of this study was to validate the diagnostic stratification ability of DF-JNET for colorectal tumors in two Japanese referral centers.

Methods: A multicenter retrospective image evaluation study was conducted by three experienced endoscopists, including an original JNET member who was also involved in establishing the diagnostic criteria. A total of two images, namely, one representative non-magnified white light image and one representative DF-NBI image for each of the 557 consecutive lesions were used in the evaluation study. The diagnostic value of DF-JNET was calculated based on the evaluation data.

Results: The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy of DF-JNET Type 1 for differentiating between non-neoplastic and neoplastic lesions were 78.1%, 98.6%, 89.1%, 96.8%, and 95.9%, respectively; of Type 2A lesions for differentiating low-grade dysplasia from others were 98.0%, 76.5%, 94.9%, 89.7%, and 94.1%, respectively; of Type 2B lesions for differentiating high-grade dysplasia and shallow submucosal invasive carcinoma from others were 43.5%, 99.1%, 66.7%, 97.6%, and 96.8%, respectively; and of Type 3 lesions for differentiating deep submucosal invasive carcinoma from others were 83.3%, 99.5%, 62.5%, 99.8%, and 99.3%, respectively.

Conclusions: All DF-JNET types had an over 90% diagnostic accuracy for the histological prediction of colorectal tumors. DF-JNET might contribute to appropriate treatment choices, such as endoscopic resection or surgery, not only in Japan but also in Western countries in which the use of optical zoom endoscopy is limited.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08863-7DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

colorectal tumors
16
type lesions
12
lesions differentiating
12
japan nbi
8
nbi expert
8
expert team
8
classification dual-focus
8
jnet classification
8
diagnostic stratification
8
stratification ability
8

Similar Publications

Colorectal cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors in the world, and about 50% of its advanced patients will have liver metastasis. Preoperative assessment of the risk of liver metastasis in patients with colorectal cancer is of great significance for making individualized treatment plans. Traditional imaging examinations and tumor markers have some limitations in predicting the risk of liver metastasis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) presents an escalating public health challenge globally. However, drug resistance has emerged as a major impediment to successful HCC treatment, limiting the efficacy of curative interventions. Despite numerous investigations into the diverse impacts of hsa-miR-125a-5p on tumor growth across different cancer types, its specific involvement in chemotherapy resistance in HCC remains elusive.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common cancers worldwide. The mechanisms underlying metastasis, which contributes to poor outcomes, remain elusive.

Methods: We used the Cancer Genome Atlas dataset to compare mRNA expression patterns of integrin α6 (ITGA6) and integrin β4 (ITGB4) in patients with CRC.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a standardized procedure for intramucosal and slightly invasive submucosal colorectal cancers (CRC). However, the role of ESD for T1b (depth of submucosal invasion: ≥1,000 μm) CRC remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the long-term efficacy and safety of ESD for T1b CRC.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) serve as pivotal tumor markers in colorectal cancer (CRC). However, uncertainty persists regarding the prognostic significance of the two tumor markers when falling within the normal range. We attempt to compare the prognostic differences of tumor markers at different levels within the reference range.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!