Objective: To compare the long-term outcomes of initial management of pelvic fracture urethral injury (PFUI) in a large cohort of trauma patients undergoing urethral reconstruction.

Materials And Methods: 119 patients underwent urethral reconstruction by a single surgeon for PFUI at our center between 1998-2018. We compared initial PFUI management - primary realignment vs suprapubic tube (SPT) insertion alone. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis was used to assess the association between primary intervention and the risk of having a complication.

Results: PFUI was initially managed with primary realignment (57%) or SPT alone (43%). Ultimately, all patients underwent a primary perineal urethral anastomosis after a median of 7 months (IQR: 5-14). Overall, 27 patients (23%) had 1 or more long-term complications after a median 25 months (IQR:7-66), including urethral stricture, de novo erectile dysfunction, and urinary incontinence. On multivariable analysis, initial PFUI management did not predict for complications.

Conclusion: No difference was found in long-term outcomes after urethral reconstruction when comparing initial PFUI management of primary realignment vs SPT insertion.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2021.10.036DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

initial pfui
12
pfui management
12
primary realignment
12
pelvic fracture
8
fracture urethral
8
initial management
8
long-term outcomes
8
patients underwent
8
urethral reconstruction
8
management primary
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!