[Social distancing as protection factor against COVID-19 in a non-metropolitan area in the State of Rio Grande do Sul, BrazilLas medidas de distanciamiento social como factor de protección contra la COVID-19 en el interior de Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil].

Rev Panam Salud Publica

Grupo de pesquisa COVID-Vale do Rio Pardo: Jane Dagmar Pollo Renner, Adilson Ben da Costa, Renato Michel, Ingre Paz, Daiana Klein Weber Carissimi, Suzane Beatriz Frantz Krug, Eliane Carlosso Krummenauer, Rochele Mosmann de Menezes, Clauciane Zell, Bruna Rezende, Caroline Bertelli, Fernanda Iochimns e Léa Vargas Grupo de pesquisa COVID-Vale do Rio Pardo: Jane Dagmar Pollo Renner, Adilson Ben da Costa, Renato Michel, Ingre Paz, Daiana Klein Weber Carissimi, Suzane Beatriz Frantz Krug, Eliane Carlosso Krummenauer, Rochele Mosmann de Menezes, Clauciane Zell, Bruna Rezende, Caroline Bertelli, Fernanda Iochimns e Léa Vargas.

Published: November 2021

Objective: To estimate the SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in a non-metropolitan area (Vale do Rio Pardo) in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, and determine the association between seroprevalence and adherence to social distancing measures.

Method: For the present population-based, cross-sectional study, data were collected in four stages from August to October 2020. SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence was assessed using an IgG/IgM rapid test. Demographic, socioeconomic, clinical, and behavioral data were also collected, with administration of a three-question survey to determine adherence to social distancing measures with a focus on the level of social distancing practiced by participants, their routine activities, and circulation of people in the home. The association between sociodemographic data and social distancing was assessed using the chi-square test for linear trends in proportions, and the association between social distancing and seroprevalence was assessed using Poisson regression (95% confidence interval [95%CI]; < 0.05).

Results: Of 4 252 tested and interviewed participants, 11.8% (95%CI: 10.8; 12.8) did not adhere to social distancing measures. The prevalence of a positive rapid test was 4.7% in participants who did not practice social distancing and 1.9% in participants who adhered to social distancing measures (< 0.05). The variables male sex, age 20 to 59 years, having completed high school, monthly family income ranging from R$ 3 136.00 to R$ 6 270.00, and living in rural areas were associated with non-adherence to social distancing (< 0.05). Adherence to all social distancing measures provided protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection (prevalence ratio: 0.37; 95%CI: 0.19; 0.73).

Conclusions: The results indicate a reduction in seroprevalence with the adherence to social distancing measures.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8611616PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2021.145DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

social distancing
44
distancing measures
20
adherence social
16
rio grande
12
grande sul
12
social
12
distancing
11
non-metropolitan area
8
state rio
8
sars-cov-2 seroprevalence
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!