Nowadays, many commercial kits allowing the detection of digestive parasites by DNA amplification methods have been developed, including simplex PCR assays (SimpPCRa) allowing the identification of a single parasite, and multiplex PCR assays (MultPCRa) allowing the identification of several parasites at once. Thus, aimed at improving the diagnosis of intestinal protozoal infections, it is essential to evaluate the performances of these new tools. A total of 174 DNA samples collected between 2007 and 2017 were retrospectively included in this study. Performances of four commercial SimpPCRa (i.e., CerTest-VIASURE) and three MultPCRa (i.e., CerTest-VIASURE, FAST-TRACK-Diagnostics-FTD-Stool-Parasite and DIAGENODE-Gastroenteritis/Parasite-panel-I) were evaluated for the detection of spp., spp., and in stool samples compared to our routinely used in-house SimpPCRa. Globally, the SimpPCRa showed better sensitivity/specificity for the detection of , , and spp. (i.e., 96.9/93.6%; 100/100%; 95.5/100%; and 100/99.3%, respectively), compared to the three commercial MultPCRa tested. All in all, we showed that MultPCRa offer an interesting alternative for the detection of protozoans in stool samples depending on the clinical context.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8623296PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9112325DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pcr assays
16
multiplex pcr
8
spp spp
8
simplex pcr
8
allowing identification
8
detection spp
8
stool samples
8
commercial
5
pcr
5
detection
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!