Background: Actual cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) guidelines recommend point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS); however, data on POCUS during CPR are sparse and conflicting. This randomized trial investigated the effects of POCUS during CPR on team performance and diagnostic accuracy.

Methods: Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine residents performed CPR with or without available POCUS in simulated cardiac arrests. The primary endpoint was hands-on time. Data analysis was performed using video recordings.

Results: Hands-on time was 89% (87-91) in the POCUS and 92% (89-94) in the control group (difference 3, 95% CI for difference 2-4, < 0.001). POCUS teams had delayed defibrillator attachments (33 vs. 26 sec, = 0.017) and first rhythm analysis (74 vs. 52 sec, = 0.001). Available POCUS was used in 71%. Of the POCUS teams, 3 stated a POCUS-derived diagnosis, with 49 being correct and 42 followed by a correct treatment decision. Four teams made a wrong diagnosis and two made an inappropriate treatment decision.

Conclusions: POCUS during CPR resulted in lower hands-on times and delayed rhythm analysis. Correct POCUS diagnoses occurred in 52%, correct treatment decisions in 44%, and inappropriate treatment decisions in 2%. Training on POCUS during CPR should focus on diagnostic accuracy and maintenance of high-quality CPR.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8625670PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10225218DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pocus cpr
16
pocus
11
cardiopulmonary resuscitation
8
hands-on time
8
0001 pocus
8
pocus teams
8
rhythm analysis
8
correct treatment
8
inappropriate treatment
8
treatment decisions
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!