Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: In individuals with unilateral plantar flexor weakness, the second peak of the vertical ground reaction force (GRF) is decreased. This leads to a higher ground reaction force, e.g. impact, of the contralateral leg, potentially explaining quadriceps muscle and/or knee joint pain. Energy cost optimized dorsal leaf ankle-foot-orthoses (AFOs) may increase the push-off ground reaction force, which in turn could lead to lower impact forces on the contralateral leg.
Research Questions: 1) Are impact forces increased in the contralateral leg of people with unilateral plantar flexor weakness compared to healthy subjects? 2) Do energy cost optimized AFOs reduce impact forces and improve leg impact symmetry compared to walking without AFO in people with unilateral plantar flexor weakness?
Methods: Nine subjects with unilateral plantar flexor weakness were provided a dorsal leaf AFO with a stiffness primarily optimized for energy cost. Using 3D gait analyses peak vertical GRF during loading response with and without AFO, and the symmetry between the legs in peak GRF were calculated. Peak GRF and symmetry were compared with reference data of 23 healthy subjects.
Results: The contralateral leg showed a significant higher peak vertical GRF (12.0 ± 0.9 vs 11.2 ± 0.6 N/kg, p = 0.005) compared to healthy reference data. When walking with AFO, the peak vertical GRF of the contralateral leg significantly reduced (from 12.0 ± 0.9 to 11.4 ± 0.7 N/kg, p = 0.017) and symmetry improved compared to no AFO (from 0.93 ± 0.06 to 1.01 ± 0.05, p < 0.001).
Conclusion: In subjects with unilateral plantar flexor weakness, impact force on the contralateral leg was increased when compared to healthy subjects and dorsal leaf AFOs optimized for energy cost substantially reduced this force and improved impact symmetry when compared to walking without AFO. This indicates that dorsal leaf AFOs may reduce pain resulting from increased impact forces during gait in the contralateral leg in people with unilateral plantar flexor weakness.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2021.11.023 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!