Chlorin e6 mediated photodynamic therapy triggers resistance through ATM-related DNA damage response in lung cancer cells.

Objective: Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a promising strategy for the treatment of malignant tumors due to its high selectivity, limited-toxicity, and non-invasiveness. However, PDT can also induce DNA damage and subsequent repair response, which may reduce the efficacy of PDT. In the present study, we sought to explore the effect of chlorin e6 (Ce6)-mediated PDT on DNA damage and DNA damage response (DDR) in lung cancer cells. In addition, the effect of PDT combined with ATM inhibitor on molecules of DDR and the possibility of improving the efficacy of PDT were further investigated.

Materials And Methods: In the in vitro study, lewis cells were submitted to Ce6 treatment (2, 4, 8, 16, 32 μg/mL). To determine the concentration of Ce6, uptake and toxicity of Ce6 mediated PDT were detected using flow cytometry (FACS), Confocal microscopy, and CCK-8. In the subsequent research, 8 μg/mL of Ce6 was the treatment condition for inducing PDT. The different post-irradiation placement times were further grouped under this condition (2, 4, 6, 12 h). Cellular reactive oxygen species (ROS), damage of DNA were measured by DCFH-DA probe, comet assay respectively. Then the expression of p-ATM, p53, and γ-H2A.X proteins related to DNA damage response, was detected by WB. The efficacy of Ce6 induced PDT was also demonstrated by Annexin-V/PI staining as well as the expression of PCNA, cleaved-caspase-3. On this basis, ATM inhibitor was applied to treat lewis cells combined with Ce6 (2, 4 h) to investigate whether the efficacy of PDT induced by Ce6 can be improved after the ATM-related DDR was blocked. The cell viability, apoptosis, and expression of associated proteins were assayed.

Results: At 2-4 h after PDT treatment, ROS was dramatically elevated in lewis cells, DNA double-strand breaks (DDSB) occurred, as well as up-regulation of DDR proteins γ-H2A.X, p-ATM, and p53. At the same time, lewis cells did not undergo significant apoptosis. After ATM inhibition, the DDR was significantly blocked within 2-4 h after Ce6 induced PDT, along with a pronounced decrease in cell viability followed by a prominent increase of apoptosis.

Conclusion: Ce6-mediated PDT generates ROS in a short period time, thus inducing DNA damage, ATM-related DDR as well as promoting resistance of lung cancer cells to PDT. Combining ATM inhibitor with PDT could effectively inhibit the DDR induced by PDT, thereby enhancing the efficacy. This study reveals a new resistance mechanism of PDT and proposes an intervention strategy.