A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Impact of incorporating Magnetic Resonance Imaging in FIGO Staging of Primary Carcinoma Cervix: Experience from a tertiary cancer center. | LitMetric

Background: International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging of carcinoma cervix, although essentially clinical, acknowledges the benefits of MRI. The impact of incorporating MRI in staging of cervical cancer and the discordance between clinical-and MRI-based FIGO staging is not well studied, especially in low- and middle-income countries.

Aim: We aim to study the role and accuracy of MRI in staging carcinoma cervix, its correlation with clinical FIGO and histopathological staging with emphasis on how it can change treatment plan.

Methods: Retrospective observational cohort study (n = 193) where MRI details of different staging parameters of the study subjects were compared with clinical FIGO staging and histopathology to assess correlation and agreement between them. Change of clinical FIGO stage and hence treatment plan brought about by incorporating MRI was assessed.

Results: MRI had a tumor detection rate of 94.3%, overall staging accuracy of 78.3% and very strong correlation with histopathology (Spearman's coefficient of rank correlation, r = 0.886). Clinical FIGO and MRI had agreement only in 52.8% cases (r = 0.61). Incorporating MRI changed the clinical stage in 47.2% patients and subsequently modified primary treatment plan in 23.3%.

Conclusion: MRI is highly accurate in evaluating carcinoma cervix and has good correlation with histopathology. Our data shows low agreement between MRI and clinical FIGO staging. Thus, incorporating MRI in FIGO staging has considerable impact in altering treatment decisions and should be offered to all patients for staging carcinoma cervix.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajco.13636DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

figo staging
24
carcinoma cervix
20
clinical figo
20
incorporating mri
16
staging
12
staging carcinoma
12
mri
11
figo
9
impact incorporating
8
mri staging
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!