Background: Historical concerns over bone resorption and malunion of the osteocutaneous radial forearm free flap (OCRFFF) limited its widespread adoption for head and neck reconstruction, despite lack of outcomes data evaluating this notion.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed including patients 18 years or older who underwent reconstruction of the mandible using an OCRFFF. Linear modeling and logistic regression were used to evaluate the change in bone volume and union over time.
Results: One hundred and twenty-one patients were included in the study. A mixed effects linear model incorporating age, sex, treatment type, and number of bone segments did not demonstrate a significant loss of bone volume over time. A logistic regression model identified lack of adjuvant treatment and time to be significantly associated with complete union.
Conclusion: This study supports that the OCRFFF is a stable form of osseus reconstruction for defects of the head and neck.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hed.26939 | DOI Listing |
OTO Open
January 2025
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Winship Cancer Institute Emory University Atlanta Georgia USA.
Objective: Complex ablative maxillary and mandibular defects often require osseous free flap reconstruction. Workhorse options include the fibula, scapula, and osteocutaneous radial forearm flap (OCRFF). The choice of donor site for harvest should be driven not only by reconstructive goals but also by donor site morbidity.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Craniofac Surg
January 2025
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
The management of oral malignancy necessitates a comprehensive approach focusing on disease eradication and patient quality of life. Surgery remains pivotal, although extensive resection can lead to aesthetic and functional challenges. Reconstruction, often with osteocutaneous radial forearm free flaps (OCRFFF), is crucial for restoring form and function.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHead Neck
February 2025
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Background: Composite rhinectomy defects pose significant challenges due to the nose's complex structure and role in facial esthetics and function. Traditional nasal reconstructions often require multiple stages to restore mucosal lining, structural support, and external skin.
Methods: This case series examines the use of a single-stage osteocutaneous radial forearm free flap (OCRFFF) for composite rhinectomy reconstruction.
Indian J Plast Surg
October 2024
Department of General Surgery, Calcutta Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
End-to-side (ES) venous anastomosis is an established approach for head and neck reconstruction and has several benefits over conventional end-to-end (EE) anastomosis. However, this is not preferred by all, which may be due to technical preferences for an EE anastomosis by many surgeons. We present here our experience of routine ES venous anastomosis for head and neck reconstruction over the past 8 years.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMicrosurgery
October 2024
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Background: This study compares the outcomes of osteocutaneous radial forearm free flap (OC-RFFF) and fibula free flap (FFF) reconstruction of mandibular osteoradionecrosis (ORN).
Methods: Retrospective review of patients undergoing OC-RFFF/FFF reconstruction for mandible ORN between 2005 and 2020 at a tertiary center. Patient characteristics, postoperative complications, and functional outcomes were evaluated using chi-squared and logistic regression analysis.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!