A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

An overview of regulations for bioequivalence assessment of locally acting orally inhaled drug products for the United States, Europe, Canada, and India. | LitMetric

Introduction: Bioequivalence is established by comparing the bioequivalence study results of generic drugs with the reference listed drug. Several global regulatory agencies have published the guidance for locally acting orally inhaled drug products (OIDPs) for bioequivalence approaches.

Areas Covered: The prime intent of the present article is to compare the regulatory guidance for bioequivalence assessment of locally acting OIDPs published by global regulatory authorities. Regulatory recommendations on bioequivalence were based on assessment for different parameters such as inhaler device, formulation, reference product selection, , and studies. The United States Food and Drug Administration and Health Canada suggest an aggregated weight of evidence approach and the European Medicines Agency promotes a stepwise approach, whereas though the Indian authorities have not published guidance specifically on OIDPs but provided guidelines for bioavailability and bioequivalence studies.

Expert Opinion: For OIDPs, currently, there is no universally adopted methodology, and regulatory guidance has not been globally harmonized. By understanding and comparing bioequivalence recommendations for different regions, we can create more sensitive, and economic evaluation methods for OIDPs. This could open more alternatives of safe, effective generic OIDPs to the public.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17425247.2021.2010701DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

locally acting
12
bioequivalence
8
bioequivalence assessment
8
assessment locally
8
acting orally
8
orally inhaled
8
inhaled drug
8
drug products
8
united states
8
comparing bioequivalence
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!