Comparing Mammographic Density Assessed by Digital Breast Tomosynthesis or Digital Mammography: The Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.

Radiology

From the Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine (J.A.T.), and Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (B.N.J.), University of California, San Francisco, 1545 Divisadero St, Suite 309, San Francisco, CA 94143-0320; General Internal Medicine Section, Department of Veterans Affairs and Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology and Biostatistics, San Francisco, Calif (K.K.); Department of Economics, Applied Statistics, and International Business, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM (C.C.G.); Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California, Davis, School of Medicine, Davis, Calif (D.L.M., T.Q.H.H.); Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Wash (D.L.M.); Department of Surgery, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vt (B.L.S.); The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH (A.N.A.T.); and Department of Training and Scientific Research, University Medical Center, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam (T.Q.H.H.).

Published: February 2022

AI Article Synopsis

  • Consistency in reporting BI-RADS breast density is crucial for breast cancer risk assessment, influencing decisions on supplemental screenings for women and their clinicians.
  • A study analyzed the consistency of reporting breast density using digital mammography (DM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) among women aged 40-79, finding no significant differences in density assessments between the two imaging methods.
  • The breast cancer risk, as determined by breast density, showed similar hazard ratios for both DM and DBT, indicating that the results of density assessments are reliable across both imaging techniques.

Article Abstract

Background Consistency in reporting Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) breast density on mammograms is important because breast density is used for breast cancer risk assessment and is reported directly to women and clinicians to inform decisions about supplemental screening. Purpose To assess the consistency of BI-RADS density reporting between digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and digital mammography (DM) and evaluate density as a breast cancer risk factor when assessed using DM versus DBT. Materials and Methods The Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium is a prospective cohort study of women undergoing mammography with DM or DBT. This secondary analysis included women aged 40-79 years who underwent at least two screening mammography examinations less than 36 months apart. Percentage agreement and κ statistic were estimated for pairs of BI-RADS density assessments. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) of breast density as a risk factor for invasive breast cancer. Results A total of 403 326 pairs of mammograms from 342 149 women were evaluated. There were no significant differences in breast density assessment in pairs consisting of one DM and one DBT examination (57 516 of 74 729 [77%]; κ = 0.64), two DM examinations (238 678 of 301 743 [79%]; κ = 0.67), and two DBT examinations (20 763 of 26 854 [77%]; κ = 0.65). Results were similar when restricting the analyses to pairs read by the same radiologist. The breast cancer HRs for breast density were similar for DM and DBT ( = .45 for interaction). The HRs for density acquired using DM and DBT, respectively, were 0.55 (95% CI: 0.49, 0.63) and 0.37 (95% CI: 0.21, 0.66) for almost entirely fat, 1.47 (95% CI: 1.37, 1.58) and 1.36 (95% CI: 1.02, 1.82) for heterogeneously dense, and 1.72 (95% CI: 1.54, 1.93) and 2.05 (95% CI: 1.25, 3.36) for extremely dense breasts. Conclusion Radiologist reporting of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System density obtained with digital breast tomosynthesis did not differ from that obtained with digital mammography. © RSNA, 2021

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8805687PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2021204579DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

breast cancer
24
breast density
20
breast
16
digital breast
12
breast tomosynthesis
12
digital mammography
12
density
11
cancer surveillance
8
surveillance consortium
8
reporting breast
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!