AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aims to compare the effectiveness of targeted one-channel percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (TO-PTED) vs. transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for treating adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) after spinal fusion in young patients.
  • A retrospective analysis of 64 patients revealed that TO-PTED resulted in significantly shorter operation times, less blood loss, shorter hospital stays, and fewer fluoroscopy times compared to TLIF.
  • Improvement in pain (measured by VAS) and functional scores (measured by JOA) was noted for both procedures, with TO-PTED demonstrating better outcomes at both 1 month and final follow-up.

Article Abstract

Objective: To compare clinical efficacy between targeted one-channel percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (TO-PTED) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in treatment of adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) after spinal fusion surgery in young patients.

Methods: The clinical data of 64 patients with adjacent segment degeneration after spinal fusion fusion surgery from September 2017 to February 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 30 patients were treated with TO-PTED (TO-PTED group), there were 19 males and 11 females, aged from 23 to 34 years, with a mean of(31.20±1.67) years;the course of disease was from 10 to 39 months, with a mean of (26.30±0.41) months. And other 34 patients were treated with TILF(TILF group), there were 21 males and 13 females, aged from 22 to 34 years, with a mean of (31.10±1.74) years;the course of disease was from 11 to 40 months, with a mean of (27.10±0.32) months. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospitalization time, X-ray fluoroscopy times were compared between two groups. Visual analogue scale(VAS) and Japanese Orthopaedic Association(JOA) scores were used to evaluate the clinical efficacy between two groups before operation, 1 month after operation and at the final follow-up.

Results: Operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospitalization time, X-ray fluoroscopy times were (76.30±5.08) min, (38.80±4.21) ml, (3.90±1.13) d, (8.80±2.53) times in TO-PTED group, and (118.50±11.06) min, (162.71±19.31)ml, (7.30±1.42)d, (4.10±0.82) times in TLIF group, respectively, the difference between the two groups was statistically significant. All patients were followed up from 12 to 24 months, with a mean of (18.00±5.63) months. VAS and JOA scores at 1 month after surgery and at final follow-up were obviously improved, and TO-PTED group was superior than TLIF group.

Conclusion: Both TO-PTED and TLIF can achieve good results in the treatment of adjacent segment degeneration after spinal fusion surgery in young patients. TO-PTED has advantages in reducing operation time, intraoperative blood loss and postoperative recovery time, but it will increase the number of patients receiving intraoperative radiation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2021.11.003DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

adjacent segment
16
segment degeneration
16
spinal fusion
16
fusion surgery
16
treatment adjacent
12
degeneration spinal
12
surgery young
12
to-pted group
12
operation time
12
time intraoperative
12

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!