Aim: To equivalence the perception of smile among laypersons, dental professionals and a commercially available popular smile designing software.
Settings And Design: In vivo - comparative study.
Materials And Methods: A total of 72 participants within age range of 18-30 years were randomly selected with a natural permanent dentition. All the subjects underwent extra oral and intra oral photographic evaluation as per the American Academy of Cosmetic Dentistry (AACD) guidelines. A total of 11 evaluators were selected for the study and were divided into four groups. The evaluation procedure comprised of assessment of patients' natural smile by laypersons, dental professionals and a smile designing software. A questionnaire was prepared for recording the responses which included a five-point Likert scale.
Statistical Analysis Used: Data was statistically analysed using SPSS version 23. Frequencies and chi square test were done for intergroup comparison.
Results: There was a statistically significant difference present in comparison across P < 0.05 all the groups.
Conclusions: There was significant difference in the perception of smile among evaluators and a smile designing software. Smile designing software prefers to modify the smile as per in built criteria and is more inclined towards creating an ideal smile.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8617447 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_152_21 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!