Risk assessment and risk stratification for perioperative complications and mitigation: Where should the focus be? How are we doing?

Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol

Department of Anesthesiology, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Feinberg 5-704, 251 East Huron Street Chicago 60611, IL, USA. Electronic address:

Published: December 2021

Various risk stratification tools are used to predict patients' risk of adverse outcomes. Most of these tools are based on type of surgery and patient comorbidities. Accuracy of risk prediction is improved when additional factors such as functional capacity are included. However, these tools are limited because data are obtained from specific patient populations, are simplified to aid ease of use, and do not account for improved treatment modalities that occur over time. Risk estimation allows for shared decision-making among the perioperative care team and the patient, for perioperative planning, and for opportunity for risk mitigation. Technological advancement in data collection will likely improve existing risk assessment and allow development of new options. Future research should focus on establishing and standardizing perioperative outcomes that include meaningful patient-centric considerations such as quality of life. We review available stratification tools and important risk assessment biomarkers that address the most common causes of adverse outcomes.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpa.2020.11.010DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

risk assessment
12
risk
9
risk stratification
8
stratification tools
8
adverse outcomes
8
assessment risk
4
perioperative
4
stratification perioperative
4
perioperative complications
4
complications mitigation
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!