In this article, the operational characteristics of coverage with evidence development (CED) programs in Asia-Pacific regions, focusing on two countries-Japan and South Korea-are reviewed. Both countries recommended the introduction of CED to overcome the barrier of lack of robust clinical evidence in the early stages of the introduction of a medical technology. However, each country has a unique approach to CED implementation that reflects the differences in establishment and healthcare and policy environments. Japan adopted a "Challenge Application (CA)" program in 2018, and South Korea introduced the "Conditional Selective Benefit (CSB)" program in 2014. Despite the positive effects of CED programs, their governance and implementation should be improved to benefit patients in both countries from the improved access to new and innovative medical technologies. To this end, CED practices in the United States (the USA) can provide insights on how to improve CED operations in both countries.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8580702PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.31662/jmaj.2021-0011DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

coverage evidence
8
evidence development
8
medical technologies
8
asia-pacific regions
8
south korea
8
ced programs
8
ced
6
development programs
4
programs medical
4
technologies asia-pacific
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!