Assessing Acceptance Level of a Hybrid Clinical Decision Support Systems.

Stud Health Technol Inform

ITMO University, 49 Kronverskiy prospect, 197101, Saint Petersburg, Russia.

Published: November 2021

We present a user acceptance study of a clinical decision support system (CDSS) for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) risk prediction. We focus on how a combination of data-driven and rule-based models influence the efficiency and acceptance by doctors. To evaluate the perceived usefulness, we randomly generated CDSS output in three different settings: Data-driven (DD) model output; DD model with a presence of known risk scale (FINDRISK); DD model with presence of risk scale and explanation of DD model. For each case, a physician was asked to answer 3 questions: if a doctor agrees with the result, if a doctor understands it, if the result is useful for the practice. We employed a Lankton's model to evaluate the user acceptance of the clinical decision support system. Our analysis has proved that without the presence of scales, a physician trust CDSS blindly. From the answers, we can conclude that interpretability plays an important role in accepting a CDSS.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/SHTI210802DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

clinical decision
12
decision support
12
user acceptance
8
support system
8
model presence
8
presence risk
8
risk scale
8
model
5
assessing acceptance
4
acceptance level
4

Similar Publications

Background And Objectives: Recent advances in multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have shown promise in medical image interpretation, yet their utility in surgical contexts remains unexplored. This study evaluates six MLLMs' performance in interpreting diverse imaging modalities for laryngeal cancer surgery.

Methods: We analyzed 169 images (X-rays, CT scans, laryngoscopy, and pathology findings) from 50 patients using six state-of-the-art MLLMs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Importance: There are no validated decision rules for terminating resuscitation during in-hospital cardiac arrest. Decision rules may guide termination and prevent inappropriate early termination of resuscitation.

Objective: To develop and validate termination of resuscitation rules for in-hospital cardiac arrest.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Importance: Biomarkers would greatly assist decision-making in the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of chronic pain.

Objective: To undertake analytical validation of a sensorimotor cortical biomarker signature for pain consisting of 2 measures: sensorimotor peak alpha frequency (PAF) and corticomotor excitability (CME).

Design, Setting, And Participants: This cohort study at a single center (Neuroscience Research Australia) recruited participants from November 2020 to October 2022 through notices placed online and at universities across Australia.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Current approaches for classifying biosensor data in diagnostics rely on fixed decision thresholds based on receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, which can be limited in accuracy for complex and variable signals. To address these limitations, we developed a framework that facilitates the application of machine learning (ML) to diagnostic data for the binary classification of clinical samples, when using real-time electrochemical measurements. The framework was applied to a real-time multimeric aptamer assay (RT-MAp) that captures single-frequency (12.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Ozoralizumab (OZR) is a novel tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor that was launched in Japan for treating patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who have had an inadequate response to existing therapies. This post-hoc analysis aimed to compare the efficacy of OZR administered without methotrexate (MTX) with placebo or OZR administration in combination with MTX.

Methods: We analyzed the OZR group (30 mg) in the NATSUZORA trial (non-MTX, open trial) (OZR group; n = 94) and the placebo group (MTX group; n = 75) and the 30-mg OZR group (OZR + MTX group; n = 152) in the OHZORA trial (combined MTX, double-blind trial), and the covariates were adjusted by propensity score matching.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!