Background There is no doubt that people with dementia can greatly benefit from the COVID-19 vaccine, especially as they are at an increased risk of developing severe complications, including long hospitalizations and high mortality rates, as a result of being infected by the virus. However, they might need the encouragement of health professionals to become vaccinated. Professionals' preferences regarding vaccination for this group are, therefore, extremely important to increase the use of this preventive measure. Aims 1. To examine hospital staff members' preferences for COVID-19 vaccination to people with or without Alzheimer's disease (AD) while differentiating between a young and an old person with the disease. 2. To examine the factors associated with these preferences. Methods A cross-sectional survey using a structured and anonymous self-report questionnaire was conducted among a sample of 278 Israeli medical staff (nurses, physicians, and paraprofessionals) working at a general hospital. The data were collected in August 2021. Results Overall, the majority (68.4%) of participants chose the 80-year-old patient with a diagnosis of AD to be the last to receive the vaccine. The percentage of participants who preferred to give the vaccine first to the 55-year-old patient with AD was almost equal to the percentage of those who preferred giving the vaccine first to the 80-year-old patient who was cognitively intact. Religion and beliefs about susceptibility to contracting COVID-19 were significantly associated with participants' preferences. Conclusion Our results suggest that hospital staff members find it difficult to decide whether age or cognitive status should be the main factor in deciding which patient should receive the vaccine first. Therefore, there is a need to implement several policy and practical steps in hospitals to assist the medical staff in such decision-making processes.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8556627 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2021.100982 | DOI Listing |
J Nurs Adm
December 2024
Authors Affiliations: PhD Candidate (Hung) and Professor (Dr Jeng), School of Nursing, Taipei Medical University; Head Nurse (Hung) and Director (Dr Ming), Department of Nursing, Taipei Veterans General Hospital; Adjunct Assistant Professor (Dr Ming), School of Nursing, College of Nursing, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei City; and Professor (Dr Tsao), Nursing Department and Graduate School, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences, Taiwan.
Objective: The aim of this study was to explore the lived experiences of presenteeism among Taiwanese nursing staffs.
Background: Presenteeism is a subjective and multifaceted experience, but nurses have rarely been invited to provide their own views of presenteeism.
Methods: A qualitative study based on content analysis was conducted.
J Nurs Adm
December 2024
Author Affiliations: Research Associate (Dr Keys), The Center for Health Design, Concord, California; National Senior Director (Dr Fineout-Overholt), Evidence-Based Practice and Implementation Science, at Ascension in St. Louis, MO.
Objective: Relationships among coworker and patient visibility, reactions to physical work environment, and work stress in ICU nurses are explored.
Background: Millions of dollars are invested annually in the building or remodeling of ICUs, yet there is a gap in understanding relationships between the physical layout of nursing units and work stress.
Methods: Using a cross-sectional, correlational, exploratory, predictive design, relationships among variables were studied in a diverse sample of ICU nurses.
J Nurs Adm
December 2024
Author Affiliations: Assistant Professor (Dr Prothero) and Nurse (Sorhus and Huefner), College of Nursing, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah.
Objective: This study explored nurse leaders' perspectives and experiences in supporting nurses following a serious medical error.
Background: Appropriate support is crucial for nurses following an error. Authentic leadership provides an environment of psychological safety and establishes a patient safety culture.
PLoS One
January 2025
Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
To validate Palestine's previously derived emergency department quality standards (EDQS) using an e-Delphi survey. A two-round e-Delphi survey validated the EDQS, developed in an earlier study through a literature review and consensus-building among Palestinian emergency medicine and healthcare quality experts. The study purposively sampled 53 emergency department and healthcare quality experts with over 5 years of experience.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMedicine (Baltimore)
January 2025
Department of ICU, Ningbo Medical Centre Lihuili Hospital, Ningbo University, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China.
The objective of this study is to examine the phenomenon of workplace bullying and its potential associations with burnout and depression among clinical nurses in China. A convenience sampling method was utilized to conduct a survey among 415 clinical nurses across 9 hospitals. All questionnaires were completed within a 2-week period in October 2023.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!