Evaluation of an Online Course in 5 Languages for Inpatient Cardiac Care Providers on Promoting Cardiac Rehabilitation: REACH, EFFECTS, AND SATISFACTION.

J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev

Faculty of Health, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Drs Heald and Grace); KITE-Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Drs Heald, Santiago de Araújo Pio, Rivera Theurel, and Grace); School of Nursing, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China (Ms Liu); Department of Cardiac Rehabilitation, Hospital Loire-Vendée-Océan, Machecoul, France (Dr Pavy); and Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Dr Grace).

Published: March 2022

Purpose: Evidence proves that health care providers should promote cardiac rehabilitation (CR) to patients face-to-face to increase CR enrollment. An online course was designed to promote this at the bedside; it is evaluated herein in terms of reach, effect on knowledge, attitudes, discussion self-efficacy and practices, and satisfaction.

Methods: Design was observational, one-group pre- and post-test. Some demographics were requested from learners taking all language versions of the 20-min course: English, Portuguese, French, Spanish, and simplified Chinese, available at: https://globalcardiacrehab.com/CR-Utilization. Investigator-generated items in the pre- and post-test and evaluation survey administered using Google Forms were based on Kirkpatrick's training evaluation model.

Results: The course was initiated by 522 learners from 33 of 203 (16%) countries; most commonly female (n = 341, 65%) nurses (n = 180, 34%) from high-income countries (n = 259, 57%) completing the English (n = 296, 57%) and Chinese (n = 108, 21%) versions. A total of 414 (79%) learners completed the post-test and 302 (58%) completed the evaluation. Median CR attitudes were 5 of 5 on the Likert scale at pre-test, suggesting some selection bias. Mean CR knowledge ([7.22 ± 2.14]/10), discussion self-efficacy ([3.86 ± 0.85]/5), and practice ([4.13 ± 1.11]/5) significantly improved after completion of the course (all P < .001). Satisfaction was high regardless of language version ([4.44 ± 0.64]/5; P = .593).

Conclusions: This free, open-access course is effective in increasing CR knowledge, self-efficacy, and encouragement practices among participating inpatient cardiac providers, with high satisfaction. While testing impact on actual CR use is needed, it should be more broadly disseminated to increase reach, in an effort to increase patient enrollment in CR, to reduce morbidity and mortality.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HCR.0000000000000619DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

online course
8
inpatient cardiac
8
care providers
8
cardiac rehabilitation
8
discussion self-efficacy
8
pre- post-test
8
course
6
evaluation
4
evaluation online
4
course languages
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!