Er:YAG Laser-Activated Irrigation in Comparison with Different Irrigation Systems for Cleaning the Apical Root Canal Area Beyond Ledge.

Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg

Division of Oral Health Sciences, Department of Pulp Biology and Endodontics, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University (TMDU), Bunkyo-ku, Japan.

Published: December 2021

To evaluate the effectiveness of erbium:yttrium aluminum garnet (Er:YAG) laser-activated irrigation (LAI) for cleaning the apical root canal area beyond a ledge. This was the first study that evaluated the efficacy of LAI in debris and smear layer removal from such hard-to-reach canal areas in human teeth. Eighty-eight human maxillary molars with either a mesiobuccal or distobuccal canal with 25°-35° curvature and mature apices were used. Following instrumentation to a size 25/0.02 taper, a ledge was created at 2.2 ± 0.7 mm short of the apex and checked using microcomputed tomography. Samples were divided into four groups: syringe irrigation (SI), ultrasonic-activated irrigation (UAI), agitation with the XP-endo Finisher (XP), and LAI. Each group was subdivided based on the irrigation regimen: 9 mL of 6% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), and 6 mL of 6% NaOCl +3 mL of 14.3% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) ( = 11). The apical 1-mm region was examined using scanning electron microscopy to evaluate the remaining debris and smear layer. Data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney test ( 0.05). Regardless of the irrigants used, LAI showed significantly lower smear layer scores than SI and XP ( < 0.05), with insignificant difference as compared with UAI. LAI showed significantly better debris removal than SI ( < 0.05) when NaOCl alone was used. In the apical area of ledged canals, the cleaning efficacy of Er:YAG LAI with/without EDTA was higher than SI and XP, but was comparable with UAI. Clinical Trial Registration number D2014-33.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/photob.2021.0044DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

smear layer
12
eryag laser-activated
8
laser-activated irrigation
8
cleaning apical
8
apical root
8
root canal
8
canal area
8
area ledge
8
debris smear
8
irrigation
6

Similar Publications

Aim: The purpose of the study is to evaluate how well the Endovac system and conventional needle irrigation work to remove smear layers (SR) from primary teeth root canals.

Materials And Methods: Fifty extracted human primary teeth were divided into two equal sections vertically, then positioned within an acrylic model that was secured with screws. Group A (Endovac), = 25, and group B (traditional needle), = 25.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: To evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of universal cements (UCs) to dentin prepared with different diamond burs using various adhesive strategies.

Materials And Methods: One-hundred-twenty molars were prepared to expose the mid-coronal dentin. The teeth were divided into two groups according to diamond bur preparations: coarse and super-fine grit burs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives:  The aim of this study was to determine the effect of apical preparation size and preparation taper on smear layer removal using a metallic needle and a new polymer needle (IrriFlex, Produits Dentaires SA "PD," Vevey, Switzerland).

Materials And Methods:  One hundred and eight single-rooted teeth with one canal were randomly divided into four groups according to the preparation and irrigation needle used: G1-30, 0.04 and IrriFlex ( = 25); G2-25, 0.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of multi-functional root canal irrigating solutions in the removal of canal wall smear layers, antibacterial activity, cytotoxicity, and tissue dissolution efficacy.

Methods: Forty single-rooted teeth were mechanically instrumented and irrigated with Triton, EndoJuice™, EDTA, and 0.9% saline.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aim: This study evaluated the smear layer removal provided by conventional, sonic, and ultrasonic irrigation techniques.

Methodology: Forty extracted human mandibular first premolars were selected and instrumented using the ProTaper Next System files and 2.5% sodium hypochlorite.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!