A growing body of scholarship investigates the role of misinformation in shaping the debate on climate change. Our research builds on and extends this literature by (1) developing and validating a comprehensive taxonomy of climate contrarianism, (2) conducting the largest content analysis to date on contrarian claims, (3) developing a computational model to accurately classify specific claims, and (4) drawing on an extensive corpus from conservative think-tank (CTTs) websites and contrarian blogs to construct a detailed history of claims over the past 20 years. Our study finds that the claims utilized by CTTs and contrarian blogs have focused on attacking the integrity of climate science and scientists and, increasingly, has challenged climate policy and renewable energy. We further demonstrate the utility of our approach by exploring the influence of corporate and foundation funding on the production and dissemination of specific contrarian claims.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8595491 | PMC |
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-01714-4 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Public agreement with misinformation about wind farms.
Nat Commun
October 2024
Leibniz-Institut für Wissensmedien, Tübingen, Germany.
Misinformation campaigns target wind farms, but levels of agreement with this misinformation among the broader public are unclear. Across six nationally quota-based samples in the United States, United Kingdom, and Australia (total N = 6008), over a quarter of respondents agree with half or more of contrarian claims about wind farms. Agreement with diverse claims is highly correlated, suggesting an underlying belief system directed at wind farm rejection.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIn "On Arrogance," Wilfred Bion made a remarkable claim: "the analyst who is treating an apparently neurotic patient regard a negative therapeutic response together with the appearance of scattered, unrelated references to curiosity, arrogance, and stupidity as evidence that he is in the presence of a psychological catastrophe with which he will have to deal." However Bion came to believe this, he sought grounds for it in a reading of that seriously distorts that tragedy. Since the clinical outcome in "On Arrogance" appears to be impasse, perhaps even iatrogenic injury, the text's value is perhaps best consolidated by historicizing its construction through a psychoanalytic lens.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFComputer-assisted classification of contrarian claims about climate change.
Sci Rep
November 2021
Department of Politics and the Exeter Q-Step Centre, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
A growing body of scholarship investigates the role of misinformation in shaping the debate on climate change. Our research builds on and extends this literature by (1) developing and validating a comprehensive taxonomy of climate contrarianism, (2) conducting the largest content analysis to date on contrarian claims, (3) developing a computational model to accurately classify specific claims, and (4) drawing on an extensive corpus from conservative think-tank (CTTs) websites and contrarian blogs to construct a detailed history of claims over the past 20 years. Our study finds that the claims utilized by CTTs and contrarian blogs have focused on attacking the integrity of climate science and scientists and, increasingly, has challenged climate policy and renewable energy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIf it ducks like a quack: balancing physician freedom of expression and the public interest.
J Med Ethics
July 2022
Psychiatry and Medical Education, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
Physicians expressing opinions on medical matters that run contrary to the consensus of experts pose a challenge to licensing bodies and regulatory authorities. While the right to express contrarian views feeds a robust marketplace of ideas that is essential for scientific progress, physicians advocating ineffective or dangerous cures, or actively opposing public health measures, pose a grave threat to societal welfare. Increasingly, a distinction has been made between professional speech that occurs during the physician-patient encounter and public speech that transpires beyond the clinical setting, with physicians being afforded wide latitude to voice empirically false claims outside the context of patient care.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFTransgenes and transgressions: scientific dissent as heterogeneous practice.
Soc Stud Sci
August 2008
Colorado School of Mines, USA.
Article Synopsis
- Scholars have yet to create a unified theory of scientific dissent, despite examining various aspects of scientific controversies.
- The paper suggests that scientific dissent involves diverse practices and introduces a processual model that highlights the dynamics between dominant scientific views and contrarian science.
- Using the case of transgenic DNA in Mexican maize and the actions of Professor Ignacio Chapela, the study illustrates how concepts like 'impedance' and various dissenting strategies can reshape the relationships between scientists, the public, institutions, and the political landscape of knowledge production.
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!