A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

The Validity and Reliability of a Treadmill Test for Structural Firefighter Applicants. | LitMetric

The Validity and Reliability of a Treadmill Test for Structural Firefighter Applicants.

J Occup Environ Med

Faculty of Kinesiology, Sport, and Recreation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada, T6G 2H9∗ (Mr Scarlett, Mr Ehnes, Dr Petersen), Faculty of Law, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada, T6G 2H5 (Dr Adams), School of Health and Life Sciences, Northern Alberta Institute of Technology, Edmonton, AB, Canada, T5G 2R1 (Dr Dreger).

Published: April 2022

Objective: This 2-part study evaluated validity and reliability of a treadmill test for structural firefighters.

Methods: Wearing fire protective ensemble, 260 participants walked at 1.56 m·s-1, completing a 5-min warm-up, an 8-min stage at a 5.71° incline, then graded stages to exhaustion. In Part 2, 21 participants completed the test on 3 separate days under standardized conditions.

Results: Average (±SD) oxygen uptake () during minutes 1-13 was similar to reported values for simulated fire-rescue work. During the 13th min, was consistent with recommendations for firefighters. in Part 2, exercise duration increased between trials 1 and 2 before stabilizing but was consistent.

Conclusions: Congruence with reported during simulated firefighting and recommendations for confirmed validity. Acceptable test-retest reliability was demonstrated. We conclude that the test is valid and reliable for evaluating cardiorespiratory endurance for firefighting.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000002429DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

validity reliability
8
reliability treadmill
8
treadmill test
8
test structural
8
test
4
structural firefighter
4
firefighter applicants
4
applicants objective
4
objective 2-part
4
2-part study
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!