AI Article Synopsis

  • The study examines whether preserving the anterior C1 arch during odontoidectomy can maintain stability at the craniovertebral junction (CVJ).
  • A finite element model was used to analyze the biomechanical changes following traditional odontoidectomy compared to one that preserves the anterior C1 arch.
  • Results indicate that while preservation helps maintain some axial rotational motion, there remains significant instability in extension and lateral bending, suggesting that posterior fixation may still be necessary.

Article Abstract

Objective: Odontoidectomy with preservation of the anterior C1 arch can be increasingly achieved by an endoscopic endonasal approach. It is controversial whether preservation of the anterior C1 arch after odontoidectomy can prevent instability of the craniovertebral junction (CVJ) and avoid posterior fixation. The aim of this research was to investigate the biomechanical effect of the preserved anterior C1 arch after odontoidectomy.

Methods: A validated finite element model of a whole cervical spine (occipital bone to T1) was constructed to study the biomechanical changes due to traditional odontoidectomy (TO) and odontoidectomy with preservation of the anterior C1 arch (OPC1).

Results: The greatest biomechanical changes in the cervical spine model after TO and OPC1 occurred at C0-C1 and C1-C2. At C0-C1 and C1-C2, the motion changes of the TO and OPC1 models had no significant difference in flexion, extension and lateral bending. Compared with the intact model, motion increases of the two surgical models were both extremely significant at C1-C2 in extension (128.2% vs. 128.1%) and lateral bending (178% vs. 156%). In axial rotation, the TO approach produced more motions than the OPC1 approach, especially at C1-C2(90.3° under TO approach, and 74.6° under OPC1 approach).

Conclusions: Preservation of the anterior C1 arch after odontoidectomy can preserve the axial rotational motion at C0-C1 and C1-C2, whereas the motions in extension and lateral bending continue to have an extremely abnormal increase at C1-C2. Thus, instability of the CVJ still exists, and posterior internal fixation may also be required after OPC1.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2021.106987DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

anterior arch
24
preservation anterior
16
c0-c1 c1-c2
12
lateral bending
12
craniovertebral junction
8
finite element
8
odontoidectomy preservation
8
arch odontoidectomy
8
cervical spine
8
biomechanical changes
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!