Development of an expected possession value model to analyse team attacking performances in rugby league.

PLoS One

Carnegie Applied Rugby Research (CARR) Centre, Carnegie School of Sport, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, United Kingdom.

Published: December 2021

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigated team attacking performance in rugby league using expected possession value (EPV) models, analyzing data from 59,233 plays in 180 Super League matches during the 2019 season.
  • Six EPV models were created based on different zone sizes, with a focus on understanding how varying the number of zones impacts the reproducibility of value distributions during matches.
  • Results showed that reducing the number of zones improved consistency in value distributions, with EPV-19 and EPV-13 being the most effective models for evaluating performance, while EPV-9 was deemed less useful due to insufficient variation in values.

Article Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate team attacking performances in rugby league via expected possession value (EPV) models. Location data from 59,233 plays in 180 Super League matches across the 2019 Super League season were used. Six EPV models were generated using arbitrary zone sizes (EPV-308 and EPV-77) or aggregated according to the total zone value generated during a match (EPV-37, EPV-19, EPV-13 and EPV-9). Attacking sets were considered as Markov Chains, allowing the value of each zone visited to be estimated based on the outcome of the possession. The Kullback-Leibler Divergence was used to evaluate the reproducibility of the value generated from each zone (the reward distribution) by teams between matches. Decreasing the number of zones improved the reproducibility of reward distributions between matches but reduced the variation in zone values. After six previous matches, the subsequent match's zones had been visited on 95% or more occasions for EPV-19 (95±4%), EPV-13 (100±0%) and EPV-9 (100±0%). The KL Divergence values were infinity (EPV-308), 0.52±0.05 (EPV-77), 0.37±0.03 (EPV-37), 0.20±0.02 (EPV-19), 0.13±0.02 (EPV-13) and 0.10±0.02 (EPV-9). This study supports the use of EPV-19 and EPV-13, but not EPV-9 (too little variation in zone values), to evaluate team attacking performance in rugby league.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8589207PMC
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0259536PLOS

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

team attacking
12
rugby league
12
expected possession
8
attacking performances
8
performances rugby
8
evaluate team
8
epv models
8
super league
8
epv-19 epv-13
8
epv-13 epv-9
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!