Background: Neoadjuvant therapy (NT) is increasingly utilized for patients with localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Given the importance of completing multimodality therapy, the purpose of this qualitative study was to characterize physician perspectives on barriers and facilitators to delivering NT.

Methods: A purposive sample of surgical, medical, and radiation oncologists participated in semi-structured interviews. Interviews were transcribed and coded by 3 independent researchers, iteratively identifying themes until saturation was achieved.

Results: Participants (n = 27) were heterogeneous in specialty, years of experience, practice setting, gender, and geography. The most commonly cited advantage of NT was the ability to downstage patients. The most commonly cited barriers included lack of access and limited evidence. Patient preference for immediate surgery was frequently cited as a barrier, but most participants felt that patients eventually understood the treatment recommendation after informed discussion. Recommendations to enhance the delivery of NT included improved patient education, communication, and better evidence.

Conclusion: In this qualitative study, indications for, barriers to, and opportunities to improve the delivery of NT for localized PDAC were identified. These results highlight the need for better evidence and protocol standardization for NT as well as methods of improving care coordination, communication, and education to improve patient-centered outcomes.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9035472PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2021.10.010DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

physician perspectives
8
perspectives barriers
8
barriers facilitators
8
neoadjuvant therapy
8
pancreatic ductal
8
ductal adenocarcinoma
8
qualitative study
8
commonly cited
8
multi-specialty physician
4
barriers
4

Similar Publications

In the field of organ transplantation, the accurate assessment of donor organ quality is necessary to efficient organ allocation and to informed consent for recipients. A common approach to organ quality assessment is the development of statistical models that accurately predict post-transplant survival by integrating multiple characteristics of the donor and allograft. Despite the proliferation of predictive models across many domains of medicine, many physicians may have limited familiarity with how these models are built, the assessment of how well models function in their population and the risks of a poorly performing model.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Surgery is a state of mind. The brain controls the hands. As a result, "technical skills" are more mental than technical.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This article presents a selection of ten key topics, carefully analyzed and commented on by chief residents at the Department of Internal Medicine at CHUV. This curated selection highlights the major advances and essential reminders in internal medicine for 2024. By reviewing this year's leading publications, it sheds light on progress in diagnostic and therapeutic approaches, both for hospitalized patients and the continuity of care in outpatient settings.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

To examine contributions of a patient advisory board (PAB) to the design and conduct of The Pulmonary Embolism Prevention after Hip and Knee Replacement (PEPPER) Trial (NCT02810704) and compare perceptions of PAB members and researchers on the Trial. This evaluation of the PAB was conducted by Clinical Coordinating Center (CCC) members who first discussed PAB contributions, leading to the design of a semi-structured WebEx interview individually querying PAB members on their experience. Two study team members analyzed transcriptions of the interviews for common themes, which were discussed and affirmed at an in-person meeting with PAB members.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Physicians are planful beings, spending much time imagining and trying to design their ideal careers. Yet, despite actuarial expectations that physicians may spend almost two decades in retirement, it is paradoxical that little attention is generally given to designing an ideal retirement.

Methods: The coauthors are physicians in the latter parts of their careers who both teach leadership to physicians and have thought deeply about physician transitions, including retirement.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!