AI Article Synopsis

  • Disaster databases are essential tools for managing disaster risk and promoting health, and this study systematically reviews their purposes and characteristics worldwide.
  • The research analyzed English-language articles from major databases up to September 2020, compiling data on disaster types, databases, and their indicators.
  • Findings reveal that while some databases offer high-quality data collection methods, challenges like various biases exist, stressing the need for countries to develop national databases to enhance disaster risk management.

Article Abstract

Nowadays, disaster databases have become a valuable tool for disaster risk management and health promotion and serve various purposes. The purpose of this study is to provide a systematic review of disaster databases in the world and to identify the objectives, information sources, criteria, and variables of disaster data registration in the world's reputable databases. To conduct review, all English-language articles published without a time limit until the end of September 2020 were extracted from the databases of Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Science Direct, Google Scholar, and Embase. Necessary information in the papers including study time, type of disasters, related databases, dimensions and indicators of global and regional databases were extracted by using a researcher-made questionnaire. A total of 22 studies have been reviewed to identify the dimensions and indicators of disaster databases worldwide. The main focus was on global and regional databases, mostly used at the level of scientific societies and disaster experts. After explanation, researchers highlighted each of the disaster databases, along with the main differences available among the existing databases. Some databases have well-defined data collection methods. Their knowledge is high quality and they can be used to create and improve a disaster database at other levels. Disaster database limitations include risk bias, time bias, accounting bias, threshold bias, and geographical bias. To support the right decisions to reduce disaster risk, it is necessary to complement existing global, regional, and national databases. Countries need to take action to set up national databases.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8552254PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1525_20DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

disaster databases
16
databases
14
global regional
12
disaster
10
systematic review
8
disaster risk
8
dimensions indicators
8
regional databases
8
disaster database
8
national databases
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!