Introduction: Some studies have reported that early administration of acetylcysteine using a 3-bag regimen may not fully prevent development of liver injury in some patients. We compared the incidence of acute liver injury (ALI) in patients receiving acetylcysteine within eight hours of ingestion between the two-bag acetylcysteine regimen (200 mg/kg over four hours, 100 mg/kg over 16 h) and the three-bag regimen (150 mg/kg over 1 h, 50 mg/kg over 4 h, 100 mg/kg over 16 h).
Method: This was a retrospective cohort study of the two-bag and three-bag acetylcysteine regimens from Monash Health, Victoria, Australia (2009-2020), compared to the three-bag acetylcysteine regimen data from the Canadian Acetaminophen Overdose Study (CAOS) database (1980-2005). The inclusion criteria included patients with an acute single ingestion of paracetamol; normal aminotransferases on presentation and acetylcysteine administered within eight hours post-overdose. The primary outcome was development of ALI (defined as: peak aminotransferase >150 IU/L).
Results: At Monash Health, 191 patients were treated with the two-bag acetylcysteine regimen, and 180 patients with the three-bag regimen. The CAOS cohort provided 515 patients treated with the three-bag regimen. ALI developed in 1.6% (3/191) of the two-bag Monash Health group, 2.2% (4/180) of the three-bag Monash Health group (difference -0.6%, p 0.7), and 2.9% (15/515) of the three-bag CAOS group (difference compared to two-bag -1.3%, p 0.4). Hepatotoxicity (ALT >1000) developed in 0.5% (1/191) of patients treated with the two-bag regimen, 1.7% (3/180) in the Monash Health three-bag regimen and 1% (5/515) of the three-bag CAOS group. There were no statistically significant differences between groups.
Conclusions: ALI and hepatotoxicity were observed in a small, comparable percentage of patients despite early acetylcysteine administration using the two-bag and three-bag regimens. Repeating blood tests at the end of acetylcysteine treatment will identify these patients and indicate those requiring continuation of acetylcysteine.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15563650.2021.1998518 | DOI Listing |
JAMA
October 2020
Division of Anaesthetics, Pain Medicine and Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London and Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Importance: Evidence regarding corticosteroid use for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is limited.
Objective: To determine whether hydrocortisone improves outcome for patients with severe COVID-19.
Design, Setting, And Participants: An ongoing adaptive platform trial testing multiple interventions within multiple therapeutic domains, for example, antiviral agents, corticosteroids, or immunoglobulin.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!