Similarities and differences upon binding of naturally occurring Δ-tetrahydrocannabinol-derivatives to cannabinoid CB and CB receptors.

Pharmacol Res

Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biomedicine, School of Biology, University of Barcelona, 08028 Barcelona, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas (CiberNed), Spanish National Institute of Health, Carlos iii, 28034 Madrid, Spain; School of Chemistry. University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. Electronic address:

Published: December 2021

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study compared the effects of Δ-THCA and Δ-THCV with Δ-THC by examining their binding to human cannabinoid receptors CB1, CB2, and heteromers in living cells.
  • Differential signaling outcomes were found, indicating that the effects of these cannabinoids vary based on the specific receptor and the structure of the compound used, showing variability in how they activate different pathways.
  • Results suggest that cannabinoids can bind in various ways, leading to different physiological effects depending on the receptor type and which signaling pathways are activated.

Article Abstract

We have here assessed, using Δ-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ-THC) for comparison, the effect of Δ-tetrahydrocannabinolic acid (Δ-THCA) and of Δ-tetrahydrocannabivarin (Δ9-THCV) that is mediated by human versions of CB, CB, and CB-CB receptor functional units, expressed in a heterologous system. Binding to the CB and CB receptors was addressed in living cells by means of a homogeneous assay. A biphasic competition curve for the binding to the CB receptor, was obtained for Δ-THCV in cells expressing the two receptors. Signaling studies included cAMP level determination, activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway and ß-arrestin recruitment were performed. The signaling triggered by Δ-THCA and Δ-THCV via individual receptors or receptor heteromers disclosed differential bias, i.e. the bias observed using a given phytocannabinoid depended on the receptor (CB, CB or CB-CB) and on the compound used as reference to calculate the bias factor (Δ-THC, a selective agonist or a non-selective agonist). These results are consistent with different binding modes leading to differential functional selectivity depending on the agonist structure, and the state (monomeric or heteromeric) of the cannabinoid receptor. In addition, on studying Gi-coupling we showed that Δ-THCV and Δ-THCA and Δ-THCV were able to revert the effect of a selective CB receptor agonist, but only Δ9-THCV, and not Δ9-THCA, reverted the effect of arachidonyl-2'-chloroethylamide (ACEA 100 nM) a selective agonist of the CB receptor. Overall, these results indicate that cannabinoids may have a variety of binding modes that results in qualitatively different effects depending on the signaling pathway that is engaged upon cannabinoid receptor activation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2021.105970DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

receptor
8
Δ-thca Δ-thcv
8
selective agonist
8
binding modes
8
cannabinoid receptor
8
binding
5
agonist
5
similarities differences
4
differences binding
4
binding naturally
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!