A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Non-inferiority of a non-gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging follow-up protocol for isolated optic pathway gliomas. | LitMetric

Background: Pediatric patients with optic pathway gliomas (OPGs) typically undergo a large number of follow-up MRI brain exams with gadolinium-based contrast media (GBCM), which have been associated with gadolinium tissue retention. Therefore, careful consideration of GBCM use in these children is warranted.

Objective: To investigate whether GBCM is necessary for OPG MR imaging response assessment using a blinded, non-inferiority, multi-reader study.

Materials And Methods: We identified children with OPG and either stable disease or change in tumor size on MRI using a regional cancer registry serving the U.S. Pacific Northwest. For each child, the two relevant, consecutive MRI studies were anonymized and standardized into two imaging sets excluding or including GBCM-enhanced images. Exam pairs were compiled from 42 children with isolated OPG (19 with neurofibromatosis type 1), from a population of 106 children with OPG. We included 28 exam pairs in which there was a change in size between exams. Seven pediatric radiologists measured tumor sizes during three blinded sessions, spaced by at least 1 week. The first measuring session excluded GBCM-enhanced sequences; the others did not. The primary endpoint was intra-reader agreement for ≥ 25% change in axial cross-product measurement, using a 12% non-inferiority threshold.

Results: Analysis demonstrated an overall 1.2% difference (95% confidence interval, -3.2% to 5.5%) for intra-reader agreement using a non-GBCM-enhanced protocol and background variability.

Conclusion: A non-GBCM-enhanced protocol was non-inferior to a GBCM-enhanced protocol for assessing change in size of isolated OPGs on follow-up MRI exams.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00247-021-05226-1DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

optic pathway
8
pathway gliomas
8
follow-up mri
8
children opg
8
exam pairs
8
change size
8
intra-reader agreement
8
non-gbcm-enhanced protocol
8
non-inferiority non-gadolinium-enhanced
4
non-gadolinium-enhanced magnetic
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!