Background We previously reported that resuscitation delivering electrical shocks guided by real-time ventricular fibrillation amplitude spectral area (AMSA) enabled return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) with fewer shocks, resulting in less myocardial dysfunction. We now hypothesized that AMSA could also guide delivery of epinephrine, expecting further outcome improvement consequent to less electrical and adrenergic burdens. Methods and Results A swine model of ventricular fibrillation was used to compare after 10 minutes of untreated ventricular fibrillation a guidelines-driven (n=8) resuscitation protocol, delivering shocks every 2 minutes and epinephrine every 4 minutes, with an AMSA-driven shocks (n=8) protocol, delivering epinephrine every 4 minutes, and with an AMSA-driven shocks and epinephrine (ADSE; n=8) protocol. For guidelines-driven, AMSA-driven shocks, and ADSE protocols, the time to ROSC (mean±SD) was 569±164, 410±111, and 400±80 seconds (=0.045); the number of shocks (mean±SD) was 5±2, 3±1, and 3±2 (=0.024) with ADSE fewer than guidelines-driven (=0.03); and the doses of epinephrine (median [interquartile range]) were 2.0 (1.3-3.0), 1.0 (1.0-2.8), and 1.0 (0.3-3.0) (=0.419). The ROSC rate was similar, yet survival after ROSC favored AMSA-driven protocols (guidelines-driven, 3/6; AMSA-driven shocks, 6/6; and ADSE, 7/7; =0.019 by log-rank test). Left ventricular function and survival after ROSC correlated inversely with electrical burden (ie, cumulative unsuccessful shocks, J/kg; =0.020 and =0.046) and adrenergic burden (ie, total epinephrine doses, mg/kg; =0.042 and =0.002). Conclusions Despite similar ROSC rates achieved with all 3 protocols, AMSA-driven shocks and ADSE resulted in less postresuscitation myocardial dysfunction and better survival, attributed to attaining ROSC with less electrical and adrenergic myocardial burdens.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9075377 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.023956 | DOI Listing |
J Am Heart Assoc
December 2021
Resuscitation InstituteRosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science North Chicago IL.
Background We previously reported that resuscitation delivering electrical shocks guided by real-time ventricular fibrillation amplitude spectral area (AMSA) enabled return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) with fewer shocks, resulting in less myocardial dysfunction. We now hypothesized that AMSA could also guide delivery of epinephrine, expecting further outcome improvement consequent to less electrical and adrenergic burdens. Methods and Results A swine model of ventricular fibrillation was used to compare after 10 minutes of untreated ventricular fibrillation a guidelines-driven (n=8) resuscitation protocol, delivering shocks every 2 minutes and epinephrine every 4 minutes, with an AMSA-driven shocks (n=8) protocol, delivering epinephrine every 4 minutes, and with an AMSA-driven shocks and epinephrine (ADSE; n=8) protocol.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Am Heart Assoc
November 2017
Resuscitation Institute, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago, IL
Background: The ventricular fibrillation amplitude spectral area (AMSA) predicts whether an electrical shock could terminate ventricular fibrillation and prompt return of spontaneous circulation. We hypothesized that AMSA can guide more precise timing for effective shock delivery during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
Methods And Results: Three shock delivery protocols were compared in 12 pigs each after electrically induced ventricular fibrillation, with the duration of untreated ventricular fibrillation evenly stratified into 6, 9, and 12 minutes: AMSA-Driven (AD), guided by an AMSA algorithm; Guidelines-Driven (GD), according to cardiopulmonary resuscitation guidelines; and Guidelines-Driven/AMSA-Enabled (GDAE), as per GD but allowing earlier shocks upon exceeding an AMSA threshold.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!