Introduction: Hemorrhage is the leading cause of potentially preventable death on the battlefield. Resuscitation with blood products is essential to restore circulating volume, repay the oxygen debt, and prevent coagulopathy. Massive transfusion (MT) occurs frequently after major trauma; a subset of casualties requires a supermassive transfusion (SMT), and thus, mobilization of additional resources remains unclear.
Materials And Methods: This is a secondary analysis of a previously described dataset from the Department of Defense Trauma Registry. In this analysis, we isolated U.S. and Coalition casualties that received at least 1 unit of packed red blood cells (PRBCs) or whole blood (WB). Given a lack of consensus on the definition of SMT recipients, we included those patients receiving the top quartile of PRBC and WB administered within the first 24 hours following arrival to a military treatment facility.
Results: We identified 25,897 adult casualties from January 1, 2007 to March 17, 2020. Within this dataset, 2,608 (9.0%) met inclusion for this analysis. The median number of total products administered within the first 24 hours was 8 units of PRBC or WB. The upper quartile was 18 units (n = 666). Compared to all other blood product recipients, patients in the SMT cohort had a higher median injury severity score (27 vs 18, P < 0.001), were most frequently injured by explosives (84.9% vs 68.6%, P < 0.001), had a higher mean emergency department (ED) pulse (128 vs 111, P < 0.001), a lower mean systolic blood pressure (122 vs 132 mm Hg, P < 0.001), and a higher mean international normalized ratio (1.68 vs 1.38, P < 0.001). SMT patients experienced lower survival to hospital discharge (85.8% vs 93.3%, P < 0.001).
Conclusions: Compared to all other PRBC and WB recipients, SMT patients experienced more injury by explosives, severe injury patterns, ED vital sign derangements, and mortality. These findings may help identify those casualties who may require earlier aggressive resuscitation. However, more data is needed to define this population early in their clinical course for early identification to facilitate rapid resource mobilization. Identifying casualties who are likely to die within 24 hours compared to those who are likely to survive, may assist in determining a threshold for a SMT.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usab455 | DOI Listing |
Introduction: Blood transfusions are common during combat casualty care, aiming to address the loss of blood volume that often accompanies severe battlefield injuries. This scoping review delves into the existing military combat casualty data to analyze the efficacy, challenges, and advances in the use of massive and super-massive transfusions in the management of critically injured warfighters.
Materials And Methods: We performed a scoping review of combat-related literature published between 2006 and 2023 pertaining to massive transfusions used during combat deployments.
Transfusion
September 2023
Departments of Anesthesiology, Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Background: Massive hemorrhage and transfusion during liver transplantation (LT) present great challenges. We aimed to investigate the incidence and risk factors for super-massive transfusion (SMT) and survival outcome and factors that negatively affect survival in patients who received SMT during LT.
Study Design And Methods: We included adult patients undergoing LT from 2004 to 2019.
Am J Emerg Med
February 2022
Department of Emergency Medicine, Brooke Army Medical Center, JBSA-Fort Sam Houston, TX, United States; Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, United States; United States Army Institute of Surgical Research, JBSA-Fort Sam Houston, TX, United States.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!