AI Article Synopsis

  • The study focuses on identifying long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) related to the prognosis of liver hepatocellular carcinoma (LIHC) through N-methyladenosine (mA) modification.
  • A significant number of differentially expressed (DE) mRNAs and lncRNAs were identified, leading to the construction of an 11-lncRNA prognostic model that can predict survival outcomes for LIHC patients.
  • The findings suggest that immune cells and mA-related genes could be explored as potential new therapeutic targets for treating LIHC.

Article Abstract

Background: Liver hepatocellular carcinoma (LIHC) is a lethal cancer. This study aimed to identify the N -methyladenosine (m A)-targeted long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) related to LIHC prognosis and to develop an m A-targeted lncRNA model for prognosis prediction in LIHC.

Methods: The expression matrix of mRNA and lncRNA was obtained, and differentially expressed (DE) mRNAs and lncRNAs between tumor and normal samples were identified. Univariate Cox and pathway enrichment analyses were performed on the m A-targeted lncRNAs and the LIHC prognosis-related m A-targeted lncRNAs. Prognostic analysis, immune infiltration, and gene DE analyses were performed on LIHC subgroups, which were obtained from unsupervised clustering analysis. Additionally, a multi-factor Cox analysis was used to construct a prognostic risk model based on the lncRNAs from the LASSO Cox model. Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were used to assess prognostic independence.

Results: A total of 5031 significant DEmRNAs and 292 significant DElncRNAs were screened, and 72 LIHC-specific m A-targeted binding lncRNAs were screened. Moreover, a total of 29 LIHC prognosis-related m A-targeted lncRNAs were obtained and enriched in cytoskeletal, spliceosome, and cell cycle pathways. An 11-m A-lncRNA prognostic model was constructed and verified; the top 10 lncRNAs included LINC00152, RP6-65G23.3, RP11-620J15.3, RP11-290F5.1, RP11-147L13.13, RP11-923I11.6, AC092171.4, KB-1460A1.5, LINC00339, and RP11-119D9.1. Additionally, the two LIHC subgroups, Cluster 1 and Cluster 2, showed significant differences in the immune microenvironment, m A enzyme genes, and prognosis of LIHC.

Conclusion: The m A-lncRNA prognostic model accurately and effectively predicted the prognostic survival of LIHC. Immune cells, immune checkpoints (ICs), and m A enzyme genes could act as novel therapeutic targets for LIHC.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8649367PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.24071DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

a-targeted lncrnas
12
long non-coding
8
prognosis prediction
8
liver hepatocellular
8
hepatocellular carcinoma
8
lihc
8
analyses performed
8
lihc prognosis-related
8
prognosis-related a-targeted
8
lihc subgroups
8

Similar Publications

Genetic and epigenetic regulation of non-coding RNAs: Implications in cancer metastasis, stemness and drug resistance.

Pathol Res Pract

November 2024

Institute of Bioinformatics, International Technology Park, Bangalore 560066, India; Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE), Manipal, Karnataka 576104, India. Electronic address:

Article Synopsis
  • * Specific ncRNAs regulate crucial signaling pathways (e.g., Wnt, Notch, Hedgehog) that affect CSC traits like self-renewal and differentiation, with some microRNAs inhibiting these processes while certain lncRNAs enhance stemness.
  • * Understanding the interplay between ncRNAs and CSCs can lead to innovative targeted therapies that address aggressive and treatment-resistant cancers, providing new avenues for effective cancer treatment.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A novel human protein-coding locus identified using a targeted RNA enrichment technique.

BMC Biol

November 2024

State Key Laboratory of Cellular Stress Biology, School of Life Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361102, China.

Background: Accurate and comprehensive genomic annotation, including the full list of protein-coding genes, is vital for understanding the molecular mechanisms of human biology. We have previously shown that the genome contains a multitude of yet hidden functional exons and transcripts, some of which might represent novel mRNAs. These results resonate with those from other groups and strongly argue that two decades after the completion of the first draft of the human genome sequence, the current annotation of human genes and transcripts remains far from being complete.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Exosomes have grown as promising carriers for noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) in the treatment of inflammation, particularly in conditions like ischemic stroke and myocardial infarction. These ncRNAs, which include microRNAs (miRNAs) and long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs), play a crucial role in regulating inflammatory pathways, presenting new therapeutic opportunities. In both ischemic stroke and myocardial infarction, inflammation significantly influences disease progression and severity.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Regulatory non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) are increasingly recognized as integral to the control of biological processes. This is often through the targeted regulation of mRNA expression, but this is by no means the only mechanism through which regulatory ncRNAs act. The Gene Ontology (GO) has long been used for the systematic annotation of protein-coding and ncRNA gene function, but rapid progress in the understanding of ncRNAs meant that the ontology needed to be revised to accurately reflect current knowledge.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Expansion of CAG repeats in certain genes is linked to neurodegenerative diseases, but the mechanisms are not well understood; this study investigates how these repeats interact with RNA editing enzymes like ADAR.
  • Researchers used induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) and brain organoids from Huntington's disease and ataxia type 17 patients to analyze RNA editing via next-generation sequencing.
  • Results showed that while some brain organoids with specific CAG repeats had decreased RNA editing, most cultures did not support the hypothesis that CAG repeats affect editing levels significantly.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!