AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigates how different alignment parameters of total knee replacements (TKRs) impact wear rates during mechanical tests, using a computational model to analyze nine specific alignment variables.
  • Two control testing regimes—displacement-control and force-control—were compared, revealing that misalignment, notably in the transverse plane, can significantly increase wear rates, with force-control yielding a stronger predictive model.
  • The findings underscore the critical importance of proper alignment in TKRs, suggesting that even small deviations (like 15° misalignment) can drastically affect wear and potentially lead to implant failure.

Article Abstract

Currently, preclinical mechanical wear testing of total knee replacements (TKRs) is done using ideally aligned components using standardized TKR level walking under either force or displacement-control regimes. To understand the influence of implant alignment and testing control regime, we studied the effect of nine component alignment parameters on TKR volumetric wear in silico. We used a computational framework combining Latin Hypercube sampling design of experiments, finite element analysis, and a numerical model of polyethylene wear, to create a predictive model of how component alignment affects wear rate for each control regime. Nine component alignment parameters were investigated, five femoral variables and four tibial variables. To investigate perturbations of the nine implant alignment variables, two separate 300-point designs were executed, one for each control regime. The results were then used to generate surrogate statistical models using stepwise multiple linear regression. Wear at the neutral position was 4.5mm/million cycle and 8.6mm/million cycle for displacement and force-control, respectively. Stepwise multiple linear regression surrogate models were highly significant for each control regime, but force-control generated a stronger predictive model, with a higher R, more included terms, and a lower RMSE. Both models predicted transverse plane rotational mismatch can lead to large changes in predicted wear; a transverse plane alignment mismatch of 15° can elicit a change in wear of up to 5mm/million cycle, almost double that of neutral alignment. Therefore, transverse plane alignment is particularly important when considering failure of the implant due to wear.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8710043PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104939DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

component alignment
16
control regime
16
alignment parameters
12
transverse plane
12
alignment
10
wear
9
wear silico
8
implant alignment
8
predictive model
8
stepwise multiple
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!