Background: Few studies directly compare the effect of interbody cages with different degrees of lordosis in producing segmental lumbar lordosis (SLL) in the transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) procedure. Thus, we aimed to investigate changes in SLL in hyperlordotic cages compared to standard lordotic cages in open TLIF procedures.
Methods: Thirty-eight consecutive patients who received open TLIF procedures performed by a single surgeon between 2017 and 2018 were reviewed. Twenty patients had "hyperlordotic cages" (20° lordosis), while 18 patients had "standard lordotic cages" (6° lordosis). Twenty-three patients had one-level TLIF procedures and 15 had two-level TLIF. Standard radiographic measurements, including SLL were assessed preoperatively, postoperatively, and at 1-year follow-up. SLL was measured from the superior endplate of the cephalad vertebra to the inferior endplate of the caudal vertebra. Changes in SLL were compared using Student's and paired t-tests.
Results: In one- and two-level open TLIF, both hyperlordotic and standard lordotic cages produced significant improvement in SLL. Among those receiving a one-level TLIF, SLL increased 7.8° (P=0.024) in those with standard lordotic cages; it increased 8.2° (P=0.020) in those with hyperlordotic cages. Among those receiving a two-level TLIF, SLL increased 13.9° (P=0.032) in those with standard lordotic cages; it increased 8.8° (P=0.023) in those with hyperlordotic cages. However, the improvement in SLL was not significantly different between the two cage types in either one or two-level TLIF procedures (P=0.917, P=0.389). At 1-year follow-up, there was no significant change in SLL, among standard lordotic and hyperlordotic cages (P=0.501, P=0.781).
Conclusions: Although it is theorized that hyperlordotic cages would increase SLL during open TLIF procedures more than standard lordotic cages, our data failed to demonstrate that. As our study examined cases performed by a single surgeon immediately before and after adoption of these lordotic cages, it is likely that surgical technique is of equal or greater importance in improving SLL than the amount of lordosis designed into interbody cages.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8511572 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jss-21-15 | DOI Listing |
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak
November 2024
Department of Spinal Surgery, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, No. 218, Ziqiang Street, Nanguan District, Chuangchun, 130041, China.
J Neurosurg Spine
October 2024
1College of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei.
World Neurosurg
November 2024
Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona, USA. Electronic address:
Objective: Although pedicle screw and rod instrumentation remains the gold standard method of posterior rod fixation, it is associated with complications, including pedicle breach and facet joint violation. There is current interest in facet joint stabilization with the potential to create a less invasive, natural arch of fixation that may avoid the complications associated with pedicle screw and rod instrumentation. This study examined the stabilizing potential of a novel facet joint fixation device for single-level (L4-L5) fixation in a human cadaveric model.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMed Eng Phys
August 2024
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Alberta, Donadeo Innovation Centre for Engineering, 9211-116 Street, Edmonton, AB T6G 1H9, Canada. Electronic address:
Eur Spine J
June 2024
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Alberta, Donadeo ICE 11-263, 9211-116 Street NW, Edmonton, AB, T6G 1H9, Canada.
Purpose: To validate a fast 3D biplanar spinal radiograph reconstruction method with automatic extract curvature parameters using artificial intelligence (AI).
Methods: Three-hundred eighty paired, posteroanterior and lateral, radiographs from the EOS X-ray system of children with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis were randomly selected from the database. For the AI model development, 304 paired images were used for training; 76 pairs were employed for testing.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!