A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

An open-label prospective study to assess short incubation time white LED light photodynamic therapy in the treatment of superficial basal cell carcinoma. | LitMetric

Artificial white LED light photodynamic therapy (awl-PDT) is an effective, pain-free treatment for actinic keratosis. The efficacy of awl-PDT in the treatment of superficial basal cell carcinoma (sBCC) has not been assessed. Patients with histologically confirmed sBCC underwent two treatments of awl-PDT 1 week apart. Lesions were incubated with methyl 5-aminolaevulinic acid for 30 min and then illuminated using the Maquet Power LED 500 theatre light (405-800nm, 140 000 lux) to deliver an equivalent red light dose of 75 J/cm at a rate of 55 mW/cm . Pain was measured using a visual analogue scale during treatment. Clinical response was assessed at day 28. Follow-up continued 3 months for 1 year. Cosmetic outcome was assessed at 3 months and 1 year. Twenty-eight patients with 36 lesions and a mean age of 63.64 (SD 2.62) were recruited. The median lesion size was 15 mm (IQR 8.75). The response rate at day 28 was 100%. Recurrence rates were 3/36 (8.3%) at 3 months, 6/36 (16.7%) at 6 months, 10/36 (27.8%) at 9 months and 11/36 (30.6%) at 1 year. Median pain scores were 0/100 (IQR 0) and 0/100 (IQR 5) during treatments one and two, respectively. Cosmetic outcome was excellent or good in the majority of cases. Although initially effective for sBCC at 28 days, 30.6% of lesions recurred 1 year after awl-PDT. Pain scores were negligible, and the cosmetic outcome was favourable. Further head-to-head studies with optimised protocols are required to determine if awl-PDT has a role in the treatment of sBCC.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/phpp.12750DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cosmetic outcome
12
white led
8
led light
8
light photodynamic
8
photodynamic therapy
8
treatment superficial
8
superficial basal
8
basal cell
8
cell carcinoma
8
3 months 1 year
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!