Objective: To investigate whether interview travel cost and time differed for urology residency applicants from medical schools with higher vs lower proportions of students from groups underrepresented in medicine (URiMs).

Methods: We identified 22 medical schools, 11 with <15% and 11 with >20% URiM students, and 17 "highly ranked" urology residency programs. We contacted the residency programs and requested interview dates, preferred lodging options, and institution-based cost-savings. We constructed interview itineraries for 22 hypothetical students (one from each school), and compared the total cost and time for travel to all 17 interviews. Total travel time and interview costs for the students at schools with <15% and >20% URiM were compared, with findings considered statistically significant at P <.05.

Results: Each student was able to attend all 17 interviews. The median total cost was similar for applicants from schools >20% URiM ($8074.80; range: $7027.60-$13702.59) and <15% URiM ($8764.60; range: $6698.48-$11966.83; P = .89). The median aggregate travel time for applicants from schools >20% URiM was 176.4 (range: 93.7-246.2) hours and for applicants from schools <15% URiM was 160.5 (range: 128.2-203.9) hours (P = .62).

Conclusion: Financial and temporal costs were similar for applicants from medical schools with <15% or >20% URiM students. Thus, absolute cost considerations are unlikely to account for differences in URiM representation in urology. However, the relative impact of interview costs may be different for URiM students. Effective and durable engagement of URiM students in urology requires an introspective assessment of objective vs anecdotal barriers to recruiting and retaining URiM medical students.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2021.08.060DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

20% urim
16
cost time
8
urology residency
8
medical schools
8
schools 20%
8
residency programs
8
exploring barriers
4
barriers inclusion
4
inclusion underrepresented
4
underrepresented minorities
4

Similar Publications

Background: Faculty tenure at U.S. medical schools has become less commonplace over the last several decades.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • A study was conducted on neurology trainees' scholarly activities, focusing on factors affecting their ability to publish, including awareness of open access (OA) journals and financial barriers.
  • Out of 72 participants from various US neurology programs, many were familiar with OA publishing, but around 37.5% reported financial challenges; international medical graduates (IMGs) specifically faced greater hurdles and showed less motivation based on journal impact factors.
  • The study concluded that prior research experience and mentorship significantly aided trainees in successfully publishing, while dedicated time for scholarly work was highlighted as a substantial barrier.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To better understand reasons for the underrepresentation of certain groups in orthopedic surgery, we investigated whether there were differences in medical students' perceptions of inclusivity in orthopedic surgery between (1) men and women, (2) White, Asian and URiM, and (3) LGBTQIA and non-LGBTQIA students.

Design: A one-time survey consisting of validated and/or previously used instruments measuring students' sense of belonging in orthopedics, prospective belonging uncertainty (an individual's worry that they will not fit in), stereotype threat (the effect of negative stereotypes on stereotyped group-members), and pluralistic ignorance (erroneously believing your beliefs are different than "typical" group-members).

Setting: The survey was distributed at Loyola University, St.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Importance: Workforce diversity is integral to optimal function within health care teams.

Objective: To analyze gender, race, and ethnicity trends in rank and leadership among US full-time academic ophthalmology faculty and department chairs between 1966 and 2021.

Design, Setting, And Participants: This cohort study included full-time US academic ophthalmology faculty and department chairs registered in the Association of American Medical Colleges.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Racial and ethnic disparities have been well-described among surgical specialties; however, variations in underrepresented in medicine (URiM) representation between these specialties have not previously been quantified.

Methods: Data collected from Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) annual reports were used to derive the Diversity of Surgical Trainee Index (DoSTI), which was calculated as the proportion of URiM residents and fellow physicians within a given surgical specialty, relative to the overall proportion of URiM trainees within all surgical and non-surgical ACGME-accredited programs in the same academic year.

Results: From 2013 to 2022, a total of 108,193 ACGME-accredited residency programs trained 1,296,204 residents and fellows in the United States.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!