Introduction: Povidone-iodine and hydrogen peroxide could be effective in against SARS-CoV-2.

Methods: A "non-interventional trial" in 88 patients (43 ± 17 yrs, 55% men) with SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal swabs (RT-PCR). 31 received mouth rinses/gargling with povidone-iodine (every 8 h, two consecutive days), 17 with mouth rinses/gargling of hydrogen peroxide, and 40 controls. PCR were repeated at 3, 11 and 17 days.

Results: After intervention the viral load (Log 10 copies/ml) remained similar in povidone-iodine (4.3 ± 2.7 copies/ml), hydrogen peroxide (4.6 ± 2.9 copies/ml;  = 0.40) and controls (4.4 ± 3.0 copies/ml). The percentage of patients with a negative result in the second PCR was 27% in povidone-iodine group, 23% in hydrogen peroxide and 32% in controls; in the third PCR, 62%, 54% and 58% respectively; and in the fourth PCR, 81%, 75% and 81%.

Conclusion: Our results do not support the clinical usefulness of mouth rinses/gargling with povidone-iodine or hydrogen peroxide in patients with COVID-19.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8542440PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eimc.2021.10.005DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

hydrogen peroxide
24
povidone-iodine hydrogen
12
mouth rinses/gargling
12
peroxide patients
8
rinses/gargling povidone-iodine
8
povidone-iodine
6
hydrogen
6
peroxide
6
[utility mouth
4
mouth rinses
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!