Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3145
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Unlabelled: The study's objective was to determine the wound healing activity of the combination of ethanolic extracts of L. leaf (white and purple), , and astaxanthin gel preparation.
Materials And Methods: For in-gel preparation, three different formulas of gelling agents, namely carbopol 934 (1%), hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) (9%), and natirum-carboxymethylcellulose (Na-CMC) (4%), were employed. Then, the organoleptic, pH, spreadability, and viscosity of the formulas were evaluated. To determine wound healing activity, six treatments, including negative control (placebo), positive control (bioplacenton), BP5 ( L. leaf ethanolic extract of white flower type 5%, L. Urb leaf ethanolic extract 2.5%, astaxanthin 0.05%), BU5 ( L. leaf ethanolic extract of purple flower type 5%, L. Urb leaf ethanolic extract 2.5%, astaxanthin 0.05%), BU10 ( L. leaf ethanolic extract of purple flower type 10%, L. Urb leaf ethanolic extract 5%, and astaxanthin 0.1%), and BP10 ( L. leaf ethanolic extract of white flower type 10%, L. Urb leaf ethanolic extract 5%, and astaxanthin 0.1%) were evaluated. All treatments were applied to an incision wound (1.5 cm). Measurement of the wound length was conducted daily for 14 days.
Results: The results showed that the carbopol 934 (1%) gelling agent formula was better than HPMC and Na-CMC. Meanwhile, the percentages of wound healing activity for negative, positive, BP5, BU5, BU10, and BP10 groups were 72.51%, 69.36%, 70.14%, 81.70%, 86.54%, and 80.21%, respectively. The BU5 and BU10 showed significant activity (p<0.05) compared with positive and negative controls.
Conclusion: BU10 provided the best wound healing activity and can be developed as a commercial product.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8562118 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjps.galenos.2021.34676 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!