Post-Cure Polymerization and Depth-of-Cure Behaviors of Dental Bulk-Fill Resin-Based Composites.

Med J (Ft Sam Houst Tex)

AF/SG Consultant, DRCS Chief Scientist, USAF Dental Research and Consultation Service, JBSA, Fort Sam Houston, TX.

Published: November 2021

Introduction: Polymerization for modern dental resin-based composites (RBCs) not only occurs immediately upon light exposure but also continues for another 24 hours, well beyond after light is terminated. However, many questions still remain about the role of polymerization kinetics in optimizing the physical properties of a new RBC type-the bulk-fill.

Objective: The aim is to study the post-cure polymerization kinetics of bulk-fill RBCs and to compare their degree of polymeric conversion (DC) and depth-of-cure (DoC) with an incremental-fill, conventional RBC.

Methods: Five representative bulk-fill RBCs [Surefil SDR+Stress Decreasing Resin Flow Plus (SDRFP), Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill (TECB), Filtek 1 Bulk Fill (F1B), Venus Bulk Fill (VB), and Sonicfill (SF3)] and one conventional RBC [Filtek Supreme Ultra (FSU)] were investigated. The upper surface per RBC specimen was exposed to a light curing unit (Paradigm, 3M-ESPE, irradiance=1221 ± 5 mW/cm2) for 20 seconds. The DC per RBC brand were measured at the bottom surface (specimen Ø=4 mm, thickness=3 mm and 5 mm) as a function of post-curing times using a Fourier transform infrared attenuated total reflection spectrometer. Real-time data recording for post-cure DC began immediately upon light exposure and continued at steady intervals, up to15 min, then again after 24 hours. The DoC of all six RBC brands (n=6 / group) were measured according to ISO-4049. Data were analyzed with nonlinear regression and analysis of variances (ANOVA)/Tukey (α=0.05).

Results: Mean DC for the six RBCs with 5 mm curing height after 24 hours were: TECB=79.5%, VB=75.7%, SDRFP=69.2%, SF3=65.8%, F1B=51.8%, and FSU=44.0%. Bulk-fill RBCs showed higher DC efficiency than the conventional RBC for both the 3 mm and 5 mm curing heights. Significant differences in DoC were found amongst the six RBC brands: VB=5.1 mm, SDRFP=4.6 mm, F1B=3.8 mm, TECB=3.5 mm, FSU=3.0 mm, and SF3=2.7 mm.

Conclusion: DCs were more affected by specimen thickness, through which the curing light was attenuated, than RBC types. Clinician should be aware not all bulk-fill RBCs have a DoC greater than or equal to 4 mm. Also, a bulk-fill RBC that has a high DC after a post-cure time of 24 hours may not have a high DoC, which is typically measured relatively soon after light exposure.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bulk-fill rbcs
16
light exposure
12
bulk fill
12
rbc
9
post-cure polymerization
8
resin-based composites
8
polymerization kinetics
8
conventional rbc
8
doc rbc
8
rbc brands
8

Similar Publications

Purpose/objectives: The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of two distinct light-polymerization protocols, used by dental students, on the placement time and polymerization efficiency of bulk-fill (BF) and conventional (CRC) resin-based composites (RBCs).

Methods: Thirty dental students participated in this study. Each student was asked to complete four Class II RBC restorations using two different types of RBCs (BF and CRC) paired with two distinct light-polymerization protocols: one using 1200 mW/cm irradiance (P1200) and one using 800 mW/cm irradiance (P800).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Surface and bulk viscoelastic stability of solvent-stored bulk-fill resin-based composite.

Dent Mater

December 2024

Division of Dentistry, School of Medical Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Photon Science Institute, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. Electronic address:

Objective: Investigate the effect of solvent-storage on surface hardness and bulk creep of fast photo-cured bulk-fill resin-based composite (RBC) compared to conventionally irradiated bulk-fill RBCs.

Methods: Three bulk-fill RBCs were studied: Tetric® PowerFill (fast photo-cured bulk-fill RBC) (TPF), Tetric EvoCeram® (EVO), and GrandioSO® x-tra (GSOx) (conventional). Disk-shaped specimens of clinically realistic thickness (4 mm) were prepared from each material for: Group A: surface measurements (18 mm diameter) and Group B: 4 mm diameter for bulk compressive creep measurements.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Diversity of short-term DC outcomes in bulk-fill RBCs subjected to a 3 s high-irradiance protocol.

Dent Mater

November 2024

Biomaterials Science, Division of Dentistry, School of Medical Sciences, University of Manchester, UK; Photon Science Institute, University of Manchester, UK. Electronic address:

Objectives: To determine the short-term (5 min) initial effects of a high-irradiance light-curing (LC) protocol on light transmission (LT%), radiant exposure (RE) and degree of conversion (DC%) of different bulk-fill resin-based composites (RBCs).

Materials And Methods: Six bulk-fill composites with different viscosities were investigated: OBF (One Bulk Fill, 3 M), EB (Estelite bulkfill,Tokuyama), PFill, PFlow, ECeram and EFlow (PowerFill, Poweflow, Tetric EvoCeram bulkfill, Tetric Evoflow bulkfill, Ivoclar), subjected to different LC protocols: one ultra-high-intensity (3 W/cm -3 s via PowerCure LCU) and two conventional (1.2 W/cm -10 s and 20 s via PowerCure and Elipar S10 LCUs).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: This scoping review aims to analyze the impact of rapid high-intensity light-curing on a new bulk-fill resin-based composites (RBCs) designed for this type of polymerization.

Material And Methods: This scoping review was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) and Joanna Briggs Institute Manual of Evidence Synthesis. The methods were registered on the Open Science Framework ( View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: The purpose was to compare the effects of rapid (3 s) and conventional (20 s) polymerization protocols (PP) of mono- and multichip LED curing units (LCU) on shrinkage stress (SS) and monomer elution (ME) in bulk-fill resin-based composites (RBC) with and without addition-fragmentation chain-transfer (AFCT) monomer.

Methods: Cylindrical (5x4mm) specimens were prepared from two RBCs containing different AFCT monomers (Filtek OneBulk-FOB; Tetric PowerFill-TPF) and one without (Tetric EvoCeram Bulk-TEC). After soaking for 3, 10, and 14 days (75 % ethanol), ME was quantified using standard monomers by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!