Objectives: Currently, there is no guidance for optimal adjuvant chemotherapy selection after pancreatectomy with a partial or poor response to neoadjuvant therapy. This study seeks to describe an institution's practice patterns of adjuvant chemotherapy selection after neoadjuvant therapy.
Methods: Patients at a single institution receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer were reviewed. Patients enrolled in trials or without follow-up were excluded. Types of chemotherapy, the College of American Pathologists pathologic tumor response, and medical oncology plans were recorded.
Results: Forty-one patients met inclusion criteria. Pathologic review of treatment effect demonstrated that 3 patients (7.3%) had complete pathologic response, 3 (7.3%) had near complete pathologic response, 16 (39%) had partial response, and 14 (34.1%) had poor/no response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Fourteen of the 30 patients with partial or poor response (46.7%) received an alternate adjuvant regimen. Pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy specifically guided therapy in 11 (30.5%) patients.
Conclusions: Despite 73.1% of patients with partial or poor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, only 46.7% received a different adjuvant regimen. Medical oncologists infrequently considered treatment effect when choosing adjuvant therapy. Pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy should be considered when selecting adjuvant chemotherapy.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MPA.0000000000001881 | DOI Listing |
Objectives: To evaluate the benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for patients with high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) using a large, well-curated multi-institutional database.
Patients And Methods: This study was a multi-institutional retrospective analysis conducted by the UTUC Collaborative Network (UCAN), combining data from 2276 patients with UTUC who underwent radical nephroureterectomy at seven high-volume tertiary care centres in the United States. The UCAN data were analysed to evaluate the impact of response to NAC on survival outcomes in patients with UTUC.
BMC Cancer
January 2025
Department of Surgery, Tokushima University, 3-18-15 Kuramoto-Cho, Tokushima, 770-8503, Japan.
The pro-tumor effects of mast cell (MC) in the tumor microenvironment (TME) are becoming increasingly clear. Recently, MC were shown to contribute to tumor malignancy by supporting the migration of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), suggesting a relationship with tumor immunity. In the current study, we aimed to examine the correlation between MC infiltration and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) response for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSupport Care Cancer
January 2025
Department of Acute Medicine, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, UK.
Purpose: Management of patients with low-risk febrile neutropenia in an outpatient setting guided by the MASCC score is proven to be safe and effective. Most patients on ambulatory low-risk febrile neutropenia pathways are undergoing treatment for breast cancer. Recent data has shown benefit of the addition of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy to cytotoxic chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting for patients with early triple-negative breast cancer.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFDis Esophagus
January 2025
Department of Esophageal Surgery, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) is the standard treatment for unresectable (T4) esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), but the prognosis is poor. Borderline resectable (T3br) ESCC has been discussed, but its clinical features and appropriate treatment are unclear. The effects of docetaxel plus cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) therapy and subsequent surgery for potentially unresectable ESCC remain controversial.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEur J Surg Oncol
January 2025
Imperial College Healthcare Trust, Fulham Palace Road, London, W6 8RF, England, UK. Electronic address:
Purpose: Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) determines partial response (PR) and progressive disease (PD) as a 30 % reduction and 20 % increase in the longest diameter (LD), respectively. Tumour volume analysis (TVA) utilises three diameters to calculate response parameters.
Patients And Methods: We conducted a pilot investigation of patients who underwent neoadjuvant breast cancer treatment and evaluation using RECIST with LD measurements and TVA with three diametric measurements, using the parameters PR (>30 % tumour regression), PD (>20 % tumour growth), and intermediate stable disease (SD).
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!