Evolving Surgical Techniques and Improving Outcomes for Aortic Arch Surgery in Canada.

Background: To explore evolving surgical techniques and outcomes for aortic arch surgery.

Methods: A total of 2435 consecutive patients underwent aortic arch repair with hypothermic circulatory arrest between 2008 and 2018 in 12 institutions across Canada. Trends in patient characteristics, surgical techniques, and in-hospital outcomes, including major morbidity or mortality, were examined.

Results: From 2008 to 2018, the age of patients (62.3 ± 13.2 years) and the proportion of women (30.2%) undergoing arch surgery did not change significantly. Aortic diameters at operation decreased (2008: 58 ± 13 mm; 2018: 53 ± 11 mm; < 0.01). Surgeons performed more valve-sparing root replacements (2008: 0%; 2018: 15%; < 0.001) and fewer Bentall procedures (2008: 27%; 2018: 20%; < 0.01). Total arch replacement rates were similar ( = 0.18); however, elephant trunk (2008: 9.5%; 2018: 19%; < 0.001) and frozen elephant trunk (2008: 3.1%; 2018: 15%; < 0.001) repair rates have increased. Over time, higher nadir temperatures (2008: 18 [17-21]°C; 2018: 25 [23-28]°C; < 0.001), and more frequent antegrade cerebral perfusion (2008: 61%; 2018: 83%; < 0.001) were used. For elective cases, in-hospital mortality rates declined (2008: 6.8%; 2018: 1.2%;  = < 0.01), as did major morbidity or mortality (2008: 24%; 2018: 13%; < 0.001) and transfusion rates (2008: 61%; 2018: 41%; < 0.001), but stroke rates remained constant (2008: 6.8%; 2018: 5.3%;  = 0.12). Outcomes remained the same over time for urgent or emergent cases.

Conclusions: Outcomes have improved over the past decade in Canada for elective aortic arch surgery, in the context of operating on smaller aortas, and more frequent use of moderate hypothermia and antegrade cerebral perfusion. Further research is needed to improve stroke rates and outcomes in the emergency setting.