The purpose of this paper is to systematically examine the research literature on the decision of expert interviewers within the theoretical framework of the Hierarchy of Expert Performance (HEP). After providing an overview of the HEP framework, existing research in the investigative interviewing at each of the eight levels of the HEP framework is reviewed. The results identify areas of strength in (Level 2) and of weakness in (Level 6). Biases in investigative interview experts' decision making is also revealed at (Level 8). Moreover, no published data are available in at the level of (Level 1) or (Level 5), (Level 3 and 4) and (Level 7). The findings highlight areas where future research and practical endeavour are much needed for the investigative interview.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8547860PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2020.1770634DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

level level
16
investigative interview
12
hierarchy expert
8
expert performance
8
performance hep
8
hep framework
8
level
8
applying hierarchy
4
hep
4
investigative
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!