AI Article Synopsis

  • The Japanese government launched a health management support program in 2018 aimed at public assistance recipients (PAR) with type 2 diabetes (T2D), recognizing the role of social determinants in health, but data on T2D prevalence among this group were scarce.
  • A study was conducted comparing T2D prevalence among PAR and health insurance enrollees (HIE) using health insurance claims, assessing differences by age, sex, and region.
  • Results showed that T2D prevalence was higher in PAR (7.7%) compared to HIE (4.1% for outpatients), with significant regional variations, indicating a need for targeted prevention strategies based on location.

Article Abstract

Background: Recognising the importance of the social determinants of health, the Japanese government introduced a health management support programme targeted at type 2 diabetes (T2D) for public assistance recipients (PAR) in 2018. However, evidence of the T2D prevalence among PAR is lacking. We aimed to estimate T2D prevalence by age and sex among PAR, compared with the prevalence among health insurance enrollees (HIE). Additionally, regional differences in T2D prevalence among PAR were examined.

Methods: This was a cross-sectional study using 1-month health insurance claims of both PAR and HIE. The Fact-finding Survey data on Medical Assistance and the National Database of Health Insurance Claims data were used. T2D prevalence among PAR and HIE were assessed by age and sex, respectively. Moreover, to examine regional differences in T2D prevalence of inpatients and outpatients among PAR, T2D crude prevalence and age-standardised prevalence were calculated by prefecture. Multilevel logistic regression analysis was also conducted at the city level.

Results: T2D crude prevalence was 7.7% in PAR (inpatients and outpatients). Among outpatients, the prevalence was 7.5% in PAR and 4.1% in HIE, respectively. The mean crude prevalence and age-standardised prevalence of T2D (inpatients and outpatients) among 47 prefectures were 7.8% and 3.9%, respectively. In the city-level analysis, the OR for the prevalence of T2D by region ranged from 0.31 to 1.51.

Conclusion: The prevalence of T2D among PAR was higher than HIE and there were regional differences in the prevalence of PAR. Measures to prevent the progression of diabetes among PAR by region are needed.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech-2020-216158DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

t2d prevalence
20
prevalence
16
prevalence par
16
age sex
12
par
12
health insurance
12
regional differences
12
inpatients outpatients
12
crude prevalence
12
prevalence t2d
12

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!