[Effects of Outpatient Compact Rehabilitation on Physical Performance and Quality of Life in Patients with Work-Related Lung Diseases].

In Germany, pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) traditionally takes place in rehabilitation clinics. According to the current German guideline "Diagnostics and assessment of asbestos-related occupational diseases", PR can also be offered as outpatient program with the essential elements of inpatient PR (compact rehabilitation [CR]). Our project investigated the effects of CR regarding acceptance, physical performance, and quality of life of patients with occupational lung diseases. CR included 24 units of 90 minutes each with physiotherapy and breathing therapy as well as device-supported strength and endurance training. The aim of our study was to investigate the effects of CR in subjects with occupational diseases of the respiratory system and a legally anchored right to PR. Randomization was therefore not planned. A total of 148 insured persons with a confirmed occupational disease of the respiratory system were invited to participate by the employers' liability insurance association; 126 patients (85 %) accepted the invitation, and 78 participants (mean age: 71 years) completed the entire program (53 %). Benign asbestos-related diseases (plaques, pleural thickening, asbestosis) dominated with around 80 %. Ailments, depression, and dementia were typical obstacles. No adverse events occurred with strict observance of the chosen inclusion and exclusion criteria and training conditions. The measurement results at enrolment were compared with those at completion of the CR. CR led to a significant (p < 0.01) improvement in all parameters of physical performance: 6-minute walking test: + 36 m, ergometer test: + 9 watts, hand dynamometry: + 29 N, quadriceps strength test: + 84 MKI. The inspiratory capacity of the respiratory muscles (Pi: + 1.1 kPa) also improved (p < 0.01). The SF-36 showed an improvement in quality of life (p < 0.05) in the subdomains "mental well-being" (+ 3.7) and "physical role function" (+ 4.2). Therefore, CR proves to be a safe therapy if the inclusion and exclusion criteria are adhered to. CR is widely accepted by patients without severe comorbidities and achieves positive effects comparable to those that have been demonstrated in rehabilitation clinics. Outpatient CR is therefore suitable for eliminating the lack of structured and certified rehabilitation and training offers in rehabilitation clinics and for preserving the effects achieved there for insured patients with work-related respiratory and lung diseases.